Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: narses
In theory, you could amend Article five to read:

________________________________________________

If you wanted to make sure the Congress didn't exempt itself from laws, for instance, why didn't Martha Stewart's attorneys appeal her conviction on the basis of the Equal Protection Clause? Anyone convicted of 'insider trading' would have the same defense--that they had not received equal protection under the law because others were blatantly violating the same laws but were somehow exempted from them.

One final point, 'cause I think we're going to disagree on this FRiend, The people we are dealing with have not concerned themselves with the niceties of the spirit nor the letter of the Law, in fact they have shown the utmost contempt for both. There is no guarantee whatsoever that the results of such a convention will benefit America, Liberty, nor our descendants. With the incredible number of people who have no employment, no business to run, no fortunes nor sacred honor to pledge to the task, there remains the possibility that such a Convention will be hijacked by the parasite class, and the end result will be far from what those who want this have intended. This razor can cut in any direction, and it is a mere tool, without conscience nor moral obligation.

167 posted on 05/13/2014 9:20:46 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

^5 to you.

I see this A5C as more hope and change.


170 posted on 05/13/2014 10:15:35 PM PDT by Loud Mime (We don't follow the Constitution, so let's change it? Foolish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson