Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ferguson: "War Zone Or US City?"... The Morning After
ZeroHedge ^ | 8/14/14 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 08/14/2014 11:49:41 AM PDT by Kartographer

Ferguson suffered its 5th night of unrest; as we feared during the day yesterday, when night fell in Ferguson, a combination of massive SWAT team presence and an increasingly disillusioned citizenry were a recipe for disaster. Over 70 heavily-armed police enforced quasi-martial-law in the troubled town, at least 10 people were arrested, tear gas and rubber bullets were unleashed, and 2 reporters were (briefly) arrested. Perhaps Rep. Justin Amash summed it up best, "Is this a war zone or a US city? Gov't escalates tensions w/military equipment & tactics."

"I've had enough of being pushed around because of the color of my skin. I'm sick of this police brutality," said one protester, who gave only his first name, Terrell, 18. "I'm going to keep coming back here night after night until we get justice."

Clashes broke out between police and protesters overnight in Ferguson, Missouri, four days after police shot to death an unarmed black teen.

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: ferguson; missouri; riots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: CPONav
What came first, thugs looting their own neighborhoods or cops trying to stop them?

What came first was a shooting and a dead guy...

BTW, why is the investigation so long?

They have all the physical evidence, the shooter, the gun, a dead body, bullet wounds, blood, spent casings, the officer involved statement and the witness statements...

Where is the official completed investigation?

21 posted on 08/14/2014 1:21:45 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC
I can’t think of any group there that has the ethical high ground in this.

Well, there are the property owners who won't be protected by the Jack Boots but will be prosecuted if they have to defend their property agianst the looters. If it were not for the innocent property owners I would encourage the two groups of scum to have at it.

22 posted on 08/14/2014 1:34:17 PM PDT by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
"I'm going to keep coming back here night after night until we get justice."

What is 'justice'? is it telling the name of the officer? how will a name help?

is it abiding by legal process and staying patient for a trial, if any?

or do they just want a body to lynch and dance around without benefit of a inquiry?

23 posted on 08/14/2014 3:07:38 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lacrew
“There’s also no excuse for police to use excessive force against peaceful protests, or to throw protestors in jail....”

The man is angling for an expansion of the ahem ‘protests’.

I don't think so. Immediately before the statement you quoted, he said:

"There is never an excuse for violence against police or for those who would use this tragedy as a cover for vandalism or looting."

He was calling for both sides to calm the h*ll down.

24 posted on 08/14/2014 4:15:00 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Or LA, Detroit, Baltimore, Washington, DC, etc in the 1960s. It’s not like this sort of thing has never happened in the USA before. Hyperbolic rhetoric only sinks to the “never let a crisis go to waste” standard.


25 posted on 08/14/2014 6:51:02 PM PDT by Henry Hnyellar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

I see a difference. He admonished people for violence and looting....something that actually happened.

Then comes the strawman....admonishing the police for interfering with peaceful protests.....which didn’t actually happen.


26 posted on 08/14/2014 8:33:19 PM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: lacrew

“Then comes the strawman....admonishing the police for interfering with peaceful protests.....which didn’t actually happen.”

Yes, that happened too. Not all of the protests have involved violence and/or looting, and by most accounts, the police have interfered with a number of peaceful protests.


27 posted on 08/14/2014 8:45:47 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson