Posted on 08/25/2014 5:43:28 PM PDT by Ray76
When does media reporting become actual collusion with selling propaganda? Perhaps the story of Mike Browns autopsy will provide food for thought.
We suspected from the outset the Parks and Crump version of the Mike Brown autopsy was likely just a propaganda ploy to sell their narrative. We knew New York Times reporter Frances Robles was sympathetic to their scheme because she was similarly predisposed in 2012 with the Trayvon Martin narrative.
Frances Robles arrived in Ferguson Missouri the morning of the autopsy Aug 17th. Perhaps she and forensic pathologist Dr. Baden flew in together. After all, they departed the same city, from the same airport, on the same date, with the same destination in mind.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Sunday mornings arrivals begin here:
http://flightaware.com/live/airport/KSTL/arrivals?;offset=2680;order=actualarrivaltime;sort=ASC
Then scroll to the bottom of the list and click Next 20″, you will go to this URL
http://flightaware.com/live/airport/KSTL/arrivals?;offset=2700;order=actualarrivaltime;sort=ASC
And there it is:
SWA223 B737 Newark Liberty Intl (KEWR) Sun 06:30AM EDT Sun 07:28AM CDT
Well ... 1960 ... at the latest. But I guess I'd say a heck of a lot earlier than that.
How in heck is that legal?
Great thread and comments/analysis at
The New York Times Was Present In The Mortuary When Brown Family Autopsy Was Conducted
Posted on August 25, 2014 by sundance
According to this post, it isn’t.. but I’m not in the ‘business’.....
JAS says:
August 25, 2014 at 8:22 pm
The New York Times was present during the autopsy.
SD, not likely. As a mater of fact, Parcells should not have been present either. If they were then they broke the law. The laws in this country specifically prohibit non-state licensed persons to be present in the embalming room at funeral homes when corpses are on the tables, this would have been where that autopsy was performed. How do I know this? I own two of them. I cant even be there myself. Look that up
The rule of law departed on the Day the Marxists determined that they were to come into power. From that time forward the law is what they say it is and not what has been properly enacted. It was a coup d’etat and is still in progress.
Sensationalist tabloids like the NYTimes pull these stunts all the time.
History has no evidence of a nation recovering when that happens.
A crime may have been committed or the NYT persons (Robles and photographer Thayer) may have been on site but not in the room.
The article makes the point that Robles appears to be working with Crump.
I haven’t read this article, but (does that ever stop anyone from posting) FWIW,
Baden’s autopsy supported the police officer’s version of event.
Baden didn’t perform the autopsy.
There are a series of articles about Crump’s Scheme Team
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/schemeteam/index
Correct. Baden flew in 2 days later.
But Baden reported that all the shots were from the front, IIRC whether or not he did the autopsy.
Where have I heard the name Crump before?
how is that legal? ...good question...
and I’m surprised Dr. Baden approved of that...if it is factual, that can become a problem in a trial..
Hopefully this will not go to Trial...That police office dropped him in self defense...It is really getting sad to see how the Police Departments across this Nation are being hit..
sorry to inform you...BUT DR.BADEN DID PREFORM THE SECOND AUTOPSY...
WAKE UP...
Fri Aug 15 At a press conference Daryl Parks said that their 2nd independent autopsy had already been performed
Sun Aug 17 - Baden flew in to St Louis
Read this
cnn now reporting and playing alleged audio of gunshots..
Dr. Baden is world renown and he would not fake an autopsy or lie about one..
all the major news outlets also reported that the family hired him for the 2ND. autopsy...we know they cover and lie for obama, but they do report the truth on occasion.
WHO IS DARYL PARKS???? a lawyer...do you trust Lawyers?
hang in there Ray the truth will be know in a few months..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.