Because it's about self-defense, you dumb leftie (not you 2Dvet!).
Wilson had the right and duty to defend himself - same as Zimmerman.
Oh, good grief!
I’m all for these people to have as few kids as possible.
Here’s what the author doesn’t get: she claims a right for a mother to raise her children in safety. Which is dependent upon the police maintaining peace and order and enforcing the laws.
There’s more than enough evidence at this point showing that the death of Mike Brown was much more complex than White cop executes unarmed black kid. Some of that evidence points to Brown charging the cop, making the cop believe that his life was in danger.
Beating up on the cops over this is a really truly bad idea. If this woman really wants a right to raise a family in safety, she needs to understand the ramifications of attacking the police, and the likely outcome that they’ll check out and she’ll have “safety” determined by the benevolence of urban gangs.
One side lives in reality, the other lives in a constructed fantasy world.
ISIS is another iteration of this phenomenon.
Black CULTURE has brought them to where they are and nothing else.... Their young men impregnate their women... Those women either abort or have them as single mothers...
Those same young men kill each other at rate that no other ethnic group experiences...
THEY will have to correct this or cease to exists as a group...
Well, the scribbler of this article is right about one thing...it is a reproductive justice issue. It’s an injustice that people like Cross actually might breed and create more liberals.
OK I will bite. So why does the gubment pay young black women to have fatherless children?
At one time, the author of such a piece would have been locked up in a madhouse. Today this whole country IS a madhouse.
I tried to read it. I really did. But my brain simply cannot comprehend this kind of idiocy. I made the mistake of reading that article posted a couple of weeks ago from that idiotic woman who said sex for a woman was always rape, and I woefully regretted it.
I guess my brain just refuses to compute that much stupid in a short amount of time.
What a disappointing article. I thought it was going to address the systematic slaughter of unborn minorities. While only 13% of the population, blacks account for about 40% of abortions. Liberals and Democrats are blacks’ biggest enemy and they keep voting for them.
As an aside - I’m confused about the Politically-Correct language used:
“Youth of color” = good
Colored youth = bad
“Children of color” = good
Colored children = bad
“People of color” = good
Colored people = bad
I just don’t get it anymore...
Can’t we just call it a police assisted, very-late-term abortion and move on?
But 40% of abortions are performed on blacks. This is more than 400,000 babies a year!
It would take cops 50,000 years to kill this many black kids.
Maybe these people shouldn’t have kids unless they’re in stable relationships with the fathers. Then the fathers could tell the kids to do what police officers tell them so they don’t get shot, like my dad did.
Separation is the only real answer.
Does anybody think this will somehow get better? Especially as we allow the invasion to continue we will become even more splintered.
Here we have a pseudo-intellectual, ambitious New York feminist moonbat sharing her expert pizza-induced deep-thoughts-on-life with us uneducated dopes out here in fly-over country.
And, as is usual with these metrosexual losers in the game of life, love and the pursuit of slugs, her promo photo shows an unfortunate bespectacled face that would stop a sun dial.
Leni
“There’s a movement in there somewhere. And we would all do well to answer its call at last.”
Yes. It’s a bowel movement - answer the goddam call already!
I don't know if the officer violated police policy and the law, or not. But he is entitled to presumption of innocence.
There are those who think black youths are entitled to the presumption of innocence also, and this is true. But that doesn't come into effect in a self-defense situation, if that is what this was.
Then the only thing that counts is that you survive unharmed. If the aggressor also survives, well and good. If not, it was his choice.
The question is, who was the aggressor in this case? All would do well to wait for the evidence to come in and be presented.
But that's not the issue is it? “Justice” must give way when “social justice” in on the line is the motto.
last sentence in article. i felt a movement in my bowels after skimming this drivel and shall now answer its call.