Posted on 09/07/2014 7:07:57 PM PDT by WXRGina
Promoting homosexuality and abortion is a form of biological warfare to eventually kill a nation.
But never-mind! Liberals can't be bothered with facts in their feel-good emotional world of Rube Goldberg theoretical constructs.
From “Global Warming” to “Homosexual Marriage” liberals love to talk among themselves about how superior and Utopian they are, while branding their philosophical and political opponents sub-humans.
By thus labeling those with whom they don't agree, they are not bound by any ethical requirement to respectfully listen to them.
Genetics usually isn’t discussed. The liberal argument is that homosexuals are born that way.
If general evolutionary beliefs were also true.
This is a stunningly clarifying statement. It deserves elaboration.
It does put two liberal sacred cows head to head.
Pure mental disorder, just buried as such to promote the destruction of the family and American culture.
There’s a silver lining in every cloud.
It is spiritual. Do not permit modern materialism to get you arguing over how many devils are on the head of a pin when the question ought to be should the devils even be there.
I read an article that was based on research publish for peer review. Not a debatable point like the post above. He had scientific evidence that during early stages of pregnancy that a protein was responsible for same sex attraction. I cannot remember specific details but something in mothers protects the baby from this happening.
I personally do not believe there is a homosexuality gene but the authors science is flawed.
The home gene may require that the gene be carried on both the mother and the fathers genes for it to be expressed. This would mean that a man carrying the gene but not expressing the gene (not being homosexual) could pass it on to his offspring
Also there are many genes that we all carry that are not expressed unless some outside stimulus activates the gene. One theory on homosexuality is that the amount of male hormone in the mothers blood at a specific point in the pregnancy alters the fetal brain in such as to cause homosexuality.
Regardless of what is the causation of homosexuality the science of the article is flawed.
Please explain the adaptive purpose that would typically necessitate the cessation of your genetic line?
Actually, I’ve hypothesized previously that a genetic defect of this variety would be natures response to “cull the herd” and basically reduce the numbers of the species with such a genetic anomaly.
The premise of this article isn’t necessarily false, but simply fails to expand upon the possible reasons on why such a genetic defect would manifest itself if it exists, IMO.
Because suicidal tendency doesn't prohibit reproduction prior to the act?
First I've heard of a suicide gene, by the way. When did that come out?
I do not necessarily agree.
The issue here is not just tolerance (which we have had in abundance) but celebration.
No-one celebrates retardation. It is a defect to be pittied, not paraded. Likewise homosexuality, sin or not.
Homos strain any patience I have when they throw their SEXuality in my face and the faces of children, who should not even be asking about normal hetero sex relations, but the parading of homos to society forces the issue. That is 1 of my biggest problems with these people.
Provide proof of such allegations to back up such a claim, and yes, I’ve heard of these speculations many times.
If we are bound and determined to debate genetics, yet another analogy is that of the sickle cell. It confers resistance to malaria.
Sin has roots in events that are pre-conception. We should be very careful. There are genes for susceptibility to alcohol abuse. We do not tell such people that it is just fine to get soused.
Sorry about the remnant of a previous post there.
Think of it more like down syndrome, a mental disorder of the mind. Basically a birth defect.
Some people say “God made them that way” or believe in Plato’s soul-mate hypothesis. Many people have challenged the “it’s genetic” argument by questioning how a gay gene could reproduce successfully......but some of us still wonder how SAME-sex marriage can be about “diversity” & different/opposite sex marriage can be considered square, straight/strait-jacketed. Surely, terms such as “gay” & “straight” are biased & Orwellian—as if saying it’s not a choice, but making moral judgments, anyway. If we all were “born that way”, then why use terms such as “gay” & “straight”—as if it is a choice? It’s beyond mere euphemism & into propaganda. Are all homosexuals happy & lighthearted? No! Are all heterosexuals straight-laced, uptight or strait-jacketed? No!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.