Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/29/2014 8:58:35 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Oldpuppymax

Here’s a hypothetical question one might pose whenever and wherever possible. “How is my soldier son/daughter in Africa more virally dangerous than some whiny b!tch nurse?”


2 posted on 10/29/2014 9:01:45 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldpuppymax

Democrats find themselves represented by dimwits in their fight against shutting down Ebola flights


This is pretty much the same with every other thing they do, it’s just that it’s impossible to spin Ebola to cover things up like they normally do and because Ebola is a highly infectious deadly disease that kills people with a horrible enough death that it gets even the most apathetic peoples attention and concern.

Amazingly, even Ebola has Democrat constituency and pressure groups to advocate for it in the United States and may not even be the most dangerous and potentially destructive Democrat pressure group out there


3 posted on 10/29/2014 9:09:02 AM PDT by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldpuppymax

You know this argument is patently absurd in one regards.

Even under normal, non-outbreak conditions no US flagged carrier is flying out of any hot zone countries.

The only two airlines that haven’t shut down service to Liberia for example is the Moroccan national airline and some Belgian airline.

British Airways flights are currently suspended in affected countries and that’s the most direct to the US carrier.

It’s hard to shut down flights from countries we don’t even fly to.....


4 posted on 10/29/2014 9:35:14 AM PDT by PittsburghAfterDark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson