I understand the whole objection to it and all, but that’s not my point now that we seem to have resolved the “main issue.”
The problem is with the terminology, namely that one can’t be a “pimp” when the same person doing the selling is the same person as the product. Again, as opposed to a “streetwalker” or general unaffiliated prostitute, who of course both (1) knocks on the car door in a seedy part of town and (2) provides the actual service.
You fail to understand: Pimps try to force traffic FROM FR to THEIR link for hits.
Service has NOTHING to do with it.
You know how many idiots with blogs show up and claim they have a “service”?
The response is “Yeah, so does a funeral home.”
Oh, come now.. let's not engage in pretense.
What of your Youtube threads where you have snagged the material
from Beck, Limbaugh and (spit) Savage?
Do you claim to be all of those guys, the material is all yours?
You're dumping dirt into the water to cloud the issue.
Don't be like Gruber and assume we're stupid.