Exodus: Gods and Kings, Moses Meets Rambo III

Charting Course ^ | 12/12/14 | Steve Berman

[reasonisfaith]

Christian Bale thinks Moses was a “schizophrenic.”

No need to waste time and money on this one.

[reasonisfaith]

And apparently the movie fabricates the parting of the Red Sea as some sort of naturalistic phenomenon. Just an earthquake or whatever.

Good luck with your stupid movie.

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

Is MOSES in this movie about 80 years old?

[Ciexyz]

oh, dear.

[yarddog]

I caught just a bit of one of the TV programs dedicated to Hollywood gossip etc. and they said Blacks are angry because the Egyptians are not being portrayed by Negroes.

Of course that is so stupid as to be ridiculous.

BTW, Ramses the Great had red wavy hair and a fair complexion.

[Politicalkiddo]

The truth often offends.

[Gman]

Christian Baal...

[montag813]

Ridley Scott is such a douchebag. This Arab-lover created Kingdom of Heaven to spread Islamophilic lies about the Crusades and it sounds like he is doing the same thing here. I won’t see it, and I hope other FReepers won’t either.

[VerySadAmerican]

I don’t object to those who say it was actually the “Sea of Reeds” and the wind could have parted the water to where it was shallow enough to cross. Even if that’s what happened, it still happened at the hand of God. It also proves it DID happen and it was no accident.

[bluejean]

The country has completely abandoned religion, particularly Christianity, and yet turns to the Bible for fodder to make movies out of. The only result can be Noah or Moses as Marvel Comic book heros with super powers and interventions by the Greek “gods” of Asgaard or where ever. There’s no understanding or acceptance of the possibility of God existing or mattering. They can only use the Bible to ridicule God and history in order to justify the glorious “now” (Obamaland). Good luck with that.

[reasonisfaith]

The word of God tells us the Red Sea was parted. Any “proof” given by men is vastly inferior to this.

Any attempt—as with this movie—to replace God’s word with the inventions of men is blasphemy and I want no part in blasphemy.

[BubbaJunebug]

Guess you haven’t seen it? I saw it yesterday and found it entertaining. Just an updated version of The 10 Commandments. Some folks may like it some not.

[stars & stripes forever]

“I saw it yesterday and found it entertaining.”

When did the Bible become ‘entertaining?’

The Bible is the Word. The Word is Jesus. Jesus suffered and died for the world.

The Bible is not ‘entertaining.’ We delight in the Word - but all should glorify God.

[Sans-Culotte]

When did the Bible become ‘entertaining?’

Sure it is entertaining. There are many accounts in the Bible of God saving His people and punishing the wicked. You seem like another of the Freepers who thread-crap at every opportunity.

[reasonisfaith]

Wanting to do a movie about people from thousands of years ago is fine. But don’t hijack a book from the Bible by replacing it with atheistic content.

[BubbaJunebug]

Which means you did not see the movie. You are going by a small time blogger from Warner Robins Georgia that has a handful of followers. When you do go see then I will take you seriously. Read Erick Ericssons Red State article about it.

[lifeofgrace]

And apparently the movie fabricates the parting of the Red Sea as some sort of naturalistic phenomenon. Just an earthquake or whatever. Good luck with your stupid movie.

You replied to yourself there.

I actually reviewed the movie not expecting to like it or reconcile it to the Bible but rather to give people perspective. I invested $8.50 to do that.

[lifeofgrace]

“I saw it yesterday and found it entertaining.”

When did the Bible become ‘entertaining?’

The movie and the Bible are totally different and irreconcilable. The movie is somewhat entertaining, but certainly not Biblical in any sense but the basic outline.

[lifeofgrace]

Which means you did not see the movie. You are going by a small time blogger from Warner Robins Georgia that has a handful of followers. When you do go see then I will take you seriously. Read Erick Ericssons Red State article about it.

Now that is just hurtful. Lucky for me I don't care. Tell me what's different between Erick Erickson's (spelling counts) assessment and mine?
Note: Erick lives about 18 miles from me, so we're both in Podunk.