Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CpnHook

‘Because your question proceeded off a faulty premise (that I’m saying jus soli is the sole rule).’

Lol. You posted to me:

‘He claims that the jus soli rule of citizenship was not the original Constitutional view’

You, by contrast, have claimed too many times to count that it *was* the original rule.

Now you’re claiming otherwise?

Lol.

Well let’s hear you first say it in so many words: ‘Ted Cruz is eligible.’

Then we’ll laugh some more.


360 posted on 02/04/2015 4:53:37 PM PST by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies ]


To: Fantasywriter
You, by contrast, have claimed too many times to count that it *was* the original rule.

Yes, and when I'd say that the context was always discussion about native-born persons. Given the extremely low percentage of citizens at birth who are born abroad, I see no need to have put a qualifier on it every time to say "oh, btw, citizens who are born abroad is a different analysis."

366 posted on 02/04/2015 8:08:42 PM PST by CpnHook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson