‘Because your question proceeded off a faulty premise (that I’m saying jus soli is the sole rule).’
Lol. You posted to me:
He claims that the jus soli rule of citizenship was not the original Constitutional view
You, by contrast, have claimed too many times to count that it *was* the original rule.
Now you’re claiming otherwise?
Lol.
Well let’s hear you first say it in so many words: ‘Ted Cruz is eligible.’
Then we’ll laugh some more.
Yes, and when I'd say that the context was always discussion about native-born persons. Given the extremely low percentage of citizens at birth who are born abroad, I see no need to have put a qualifier on it every time to say "oh, btw, citizens who are born abroad is a different analysis."