Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just released notice .... ATF intends to reclassify and ban "armor piercing" ammo including M855
AR15.COM ^ | Feb 13, 2014 | smcgee1970

Posted on 02/14/2015 4:53:28 PM PST by bkopto

"Some ammunition that was previously exempted as “primarily intended to be used for sporting purposes,” specifically 5.56mm constituent projectiles of SS109 and M855 cartridges, will again be regulated as “armor piercing ammunition.” Except as provided by law, no person may manufacture or import such ammunition, and manufacturers or importers may not sell or deliver such ammunition. ATF will maintain the exemption for 30-06 M2AP cartridges

Proposed change to ATF regulatory framework for "armor piercing" ammunition.

(Excerpt) Read more at ar15.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: 556; atf; banglist; batfe; rkba
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Lazamataz

“So I give them a minor nod for not making new law up out of whole cloth.”

But, why are they doing this now?


21 posted on 02/14/2015 5:20:29 PM PST by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

domestic and foreign


22 posted on 02/14/2015 5:21:17 PM PST by faithhopecharity ((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

Isn’t 30.06 or .308 the kind of ammo that can penetrate. How rediculous are they going to get?


23 posted on 02/14/2015 5:21:38 PM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

Congress is bypassed yes, but this probably could not happen without the consent or connivance of the socalled “leadership’ in Congress


24 posted on 02/14/2015 5:22:25 PM PST by faithhopecharity ((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
When Ruby shot Oswald they say Oswald was dead before he hit the ground. Ruby targeted the upper inner thigh ... an area which is probably difficult to protect with armor without sacrificing mobility (and also an easy target).

I think i'll still be able to defend myself pretty well with that bit of knowledge.

25 posted on 02/14/2015 5:22:50 PM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cry if I Wanna

m855 is usually 2-4 moa...absolutely fine for milspec ammo and real world shtf engagements. Its not target ammo, never was designed for that. It’s designed for +300meter penetration. Under 100m...m193 higher velocity does the job. Also depends on the rifle/twist but m855 is not bad stuff if you know what your doing with it.


26 posted on 02/14/2015 5:23:06 PM PST by gwgn02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

TC Contenders have been chambered for .223 for decades.


27 posted on 02/14/2015 5:24:41 PM PST by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I don’t know the exact reading of the law but just about every rifle round has been available in handguns for a very long time.

The 5.56 was available in the Thompson Center handgun long before 1986.

The AR type handguns are pretty much a joke in my opinion tho I admit I have never fired one.


28 posted on 02/14/2015 5:25:47 PM PST by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cry if I Wanna

My husband says it’s very inaccurate. —

Can’t even hit a LARGE fish with it.


29 posted on 02/14/2015 5:26:44 PM PST by Scrambler Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

Someone always beats me to it.


30 posted on 02/14/2015 5:27:10 PM PST by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
Ruby targeted the upper inner thigh.

There's a big artery right there. Hit it and the person will bleed out in minutes.

31 posted on 02/14/2015 5:28:48 PM PST by Cry if I Wanna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
It is amazing what gun guys have come up with if you read. I still want to try out a .357/44 B&D in a Ruger Blackhawk some day.
32 posted on 02/14/2015 5:30:23 PM PST by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MileHi

Sure, but (even mentioned in the copy) single-shot pistols didn’t count.


33 posted on 02/14/2015 5:30:56 PM PST by Lazamataz (With friends like Boehner, we don't need Democrats. -- Laz A. Mataz, 2015)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Semi automatic pistols in .30 carbine have been around also long before 1986. They weren’t very good but that is not the question.

The .30 carbine is also a fmj military round.


34 posted on 02/14/2015 5:35:32 PM PST by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

Seems like a good 2nd Amendment case could be made on this topic: there is no distinction nor requirement under the Second Amendment that arms be used or required “for sporting purposes.”

The Second Amendment is not about deer hunting (sorry American Hunter) nor about punching holes in paper. It’s about defending our freedoms from governments such as we have right now.


35 posted on 02/14/2015 5:35:54 PM PST by Redbob (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto; COUNTrecount; Nowhere Man; FightThePower!; C. Edmund Wright; jacob allen; Travis McGee; ...
At no point in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason ~ nully's son

The biggest killer of mankind

Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!

To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...

We're armed so you don't have to be...

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” Barack Hussein Obama, 7/2/2008
They don’t call it a Civil Defense force, that would imply we need (or perhaps that we deserve) defense. The official name is National Civilian Community Corps.

I think of it as the NatCCC, or more simply, as the NatCs...

36 posted on 02/14/2015 5:36:25 PM PST by null and void (People who deny history are trying to recreate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

It’s gone everywhere—from what I’ve read about the round and what my Marine brother says about it, it’s not even that good, nor AP.


37 posted on 02/14/2015 5:36:43 PM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Fer cryin’ out loud! You expect me to read the article?

Still, they are pretty particular about Contenders being “handguns”.

38 posted on 02/14/2015 5:37:42 PM PST by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
When Ruby shot Oswald they say Oswald was dead before he hit the ground. Ruby targeted the upper inner thigh.

I'd just left Oswald's image pages. Shown on a gurney, Oswald has a wound in the left abdomen—at the bottom edge of the rib cage. The detective holding Oswald's left arm just missed getting his hand shot.

http://www.slate.com/content/dam/slate/articles/news_and_politics/the_spectator/2013/11/131120_SPEC_LeeHarveyOswaldDallas.jpg.CROP.promo-mediumlarge.jpg

39 posted on 02/14/2015 5:39:28 PM PST by Does so (SCOTUS Newbies Imperil USA...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

“withdrawing the exemption will not place individuals in criminal possession of armor piercing ammunition.”

“However, with few exceptions, manufacturers will be unable to produce such armor piercing ammunition, importers will be unable to import such ammunition, and manufacturers and importers will be prohibited from selling or distributing the ammunition.”

It’s not a ban. You can still have the ammunition you just
cant get or make anymore and you cant sell what you have.
Guns will be next. You can have your right to have a gun
you just cant buy, build or sell them. If that isn’t an
end-run around the bill of rights nothing is.


40 posted on 02/14/2015 5:42:02 PM PST by Slambat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson