Posted on 02/21/2015 4:38:22 PM PST by Ray76
Kevin Williamson’s thoughtful and helpful piece, “The Front Man,” raises the question of why President Obama has so openly, systematically, and remorselessly set about exploring the limits of his ability to disregard the law. I have a somewhat different take on that question, and it begins with this video excerpt from an address given by Obama in 2002. There, Obama says, “I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but rich people are all for non-violence. Why wouldn’t they be? They’ve got what they want.”
Here the future president shows himself perfectly capable of drawing upon the thought of his more questionable friends, who argued that the chronic violence of the system itself justifies counter-violence, at least in principle, even if not in practice in our current context.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
Why does a dog lick its genitals?
As a community activist, and a halfrican raised as a mozloid, he’s above the law.
He’s entitled, doncha know.
... let me count the ways.
This is the same equivalence he gives to Islam.
They are only upset because we aren’t deferential
enough.
Because there is no one to stop him.
Because the GOP is too spineless and cowardly to stand up to him.
Hussein is but a tool in the hands of others. Whoever “they” are call the shots. “They” are getting away with a lot.
Why did Stalin have no compunctions about The Holodomor?
Bill Ayers would.
A Caliph IS the Law..
You beat me to it. He’s black and is daring impeachment.
Because he is an ENABLED sociopath,
encouraged to lie and encouraged to show no documents
by his backers and controllers,
and enabled by the EXEMPT like Boehner and McConnell.
because he knows most people will do nothing if he breaks the law....we live in a nation where few people will speak out to save the nation including elected officials from both parties.
If Webster’s dictionary needed a picture for the definition, Obama would be the perfect choice.
. . . . Because Al Gore (ironically) had one thing right - there really is “no controlling authority” overseeing anything the government does.
if someone high up breaks the law it sends the message that it is ok to break the law
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.