Don’t think I have 100,000 years to read the article. How about the executive summary, or is it worthwhile?
My read was that increase in temperatures causes the increase in CO2. IOW to me it isn’t pro AGW.
The main point of this article, as I see it is: We should be far more concerned about the coming return to Ice Age conditions... which, are more the 'norm' for Earth.
We are due... perhaps, over-due. And the trends don't look good.