Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Social Security Number Fraud Evidence Goes to Judge Who Blocked Illegal Amnesty
Sons Of Liberty Media ^ | 4/2/2015 | Tim Brown

Posted on 04/04/2015 8:30:38 AM PDT by HomerBohn

Andrew Hanen is the Texas judge who has stood in the way of Barack Obama’s illegal executive amnesty, even going so far as to threaten Obama’s Justice Department with perjury, which would have provided many of his donors with cheap labor and was an obvious violation of the law.

As a result of his actions, Americans have benefited from increased wages. However, the attorney that first filed an amnesty challenge before Judge Hanen has now submitted 150 pages of documented evidence concerning Obama’s fraudulent Social Security number before the judge.

Attorney and medical doctor Orly Taitz, who has been involved in numerous cases involving Obama’s fraudulent documentation, submitted the very first challenge to Obama’s illegal executive amnesty, long before the twenty-six states, which most people have heard about in the media, filed theirs. By the time those states had issued challenges before the court, Taitz already had two injunction hearings before the Texas judge and got an order to show cause, which was issue by Judge Hanen.

Following her efforts, Taitz also filed a motion which seeks to amend her complain to include new additional facts. Among those facts are that many of the illegal aliens that are in the united States are using fraudulent identification, including stolen Social Security numbers. In fact, Taitz claims that she has been the victim of identity theft. Her Social Security number was stolen, according to an admission of by the Internal Revenue Service.

“When I sought a copy of the fraudulent tax return and request for refund filed by the thief with the IRS, I was denied my request,” wrote Taitz. “I could get the identity of the thief by the bank account number which the thief attached to his request for a refund.”

“The IRS is aiding and abetting criminals by refusing to provide victims with information,” Taitz told Sons of Liberty Media.

This led to her then providing Judge Hanen with 150 pages of evidence concerning the fraudulent identity of Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Soebarkah. After all, if illegal aliens are doing this, and the idea is to help hold them accountable under the law, why is the chief law enforcer in the country involved in the same criminal activity.

Obama is using a stolen Social Security number, as we have documented previously. There has been absolutely no credible rebuttal of that fact.

His Social Security number is 042-68-4425 and was issued by Connecticut, though he never lived in the state. In fact, that number was actually issued to one Harry Bounel, who was born in 1890!

Taitz recently called on actor George Clooney‘s wife, Amal Almuddin Clooney, to investigate Obama’s fraudulent identification.

Taitz told Sons of Liberty Media that her efforts were in large part due to the fact that many of the illegals coming across the border were not only are stealing identifications, but they are coming into the US with infectious diseases. Part of one of her motions was to deal with that issue. As a medical doctor, Taitz confirmed what Border Patrol has been telling us concerning those with infectious diseases crossing the US/Mexico border.

Now the question remains how Judge Andrew Hanen will rule once he sees all of the evidence. It appears we are not going to see any constitutional efforts to impeach Barack Obama by Congress, though that would be the rightful remedy in this matter. However, a Texas judge taking a stand against the usurper-in-chief has already drawn many Americans to his aid. I wonder if he would do the same thing regarding the crime of identity theft that the current occupant of the White House is engaged in.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bathhousebarry; bedwettingbarry; birftards; birthers; hanen; liarcheatpervert; naturalborncitizen; obamassnumber; obamassnumbver; phonypresident
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: erkelly

WOW - had no idea there were so many.... My dentist is a DMD and I had to ask what that meant the first time I went to him.

Doctor of Dental Surgery (DDS)
Doctor of Dental Medicine (DMD)
Doctor of Dentistry (DD)[1]
Doctor of Medical Dentistry (DrMedDent)
Bachelor of Dentistry (BDent)
Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS or BChD or BDentS)
Bachelor of Dental Science (BDSc or BDentSc)
Bachelor of Oral Health in Dental Science (B OH DSc)
Graduate Diploma in Dentistry (Grad Dip Dent)
Master of Science in Dental Surgery (MScDS)


61 posted on 04/04/2015 5:19:48 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

“”My brain hurts””

Yes but you did good.....


62 posted on 04/04/2015 5:21:01 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: DrDude

Are we sure he even exists or have we all been in a terrible nightmare for the past six years? I hope we soon wake up if that’s the case!


63 posted on 04/04/2015 5:22:33 PM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Thank You Rush

I think it is important to stay on one subject and not “water it down”, so to speak. I am currently pulling some old articles on FR and pointing out some important points. Obama used a false ss# on his Federal Income tax. Two to three years later, we are stuck on discussing the issue of SS #’s being issued in specific states(this has been proven for years) and whether “states issue SS #’s”(clearly a distraction from the main subject).


64 posted on 04/05/2015 7:24:33 AM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

Perhaps this was the reason he was disbarred by State of Illinois - providing false information?


65 posted on 04/05/2015 7:31:34 AM PDT by newfreep ("Evil succeeds when good men do nothting" - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DrDude

Obama’s 2000-2013 federal income tax returns are available on the Internet:
http://www.taxhistory.org/www/website.nsf/Web/PresidentialTaxReturns

Obviously the IRS, even during the Bush Administration allowed him to file with a phony Social Security number.
I wonder why.


66 posted on 04/05/2015 11:54:37 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

I didn’t look at them all but ss# is missing. I do recall seeing a tax return on FR with the ss# listed.

No one is going to look at these Theives ss#. That was the entire purpose of the stolen ss#. They didn’t actually steal the identity. When it came to light, no one will look. Just like the BC, Draft Register Card, etc.. Obama owns the IRS. Just gave Lois a Get out of Jail Free card.

Of note: 2013 return shows mortgage interest. I recall seeing that the Obama’s have the house in Chicago in a lawyers name. Possibly a trust. Thus they didn’t file correctly. The trust would file a return to claim the interest. Who is going to audit the Obamas


67 posted on 04/05/2015 12:25:29 PM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

This is another account of Dr. Taitz’s litigation before Judge Hanen’s court.

There’s also a wealth of information on Obama’s Fraud of the Millennium compiled in convenient form at this site:
https://archive.org/details/ObamasFakeSocialSecurityNumberIdentity-TaitzVAstrue


http://universalfreepress.com/obamas-fraudulent-social-security-number-turned-over-to-texas-judge-who-halted-illegal-amnesty/

By Rick Wells
April 3, 2015

“Dr. Orly Taitz is an attorney who has been leading the effort since the early days of the false Obama “presidency” to expose the fraud that has been perpetrated upon the American people by this Manchurian mystery man of unknown origin. She has been at the forefront of investigation, exposing and litigating his false identity and the endless cover-ups that surround it.

Atty Taitz has gone one step further, submitting the fraudulent social security number of Hussein Obama to Judge Andrew Hanen, the same judge who issued an injunction against the illegal dictatorial amnesty. Taitz has a case filed in July of 2014 which is also before Judge Hanen and which is further along in the legal process than the one filed by 26 states which was the source of the amnesty injunction.

Dr. Taitz issued an update on her website, informing the public about the status of latest effort to bring justice to the greatest fraud of all time. Included in that update was the following, potentially quite explosive revelation in light of what seems to be an honest judge undeterred by political influence or intimidation. Taitz wrote”

I provided Judge Hanen with 150 pages of evidence, some of it under seal, which show that Barack Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Soebarkah is one of the individuals, who is using a stolen Social Security number, namely Connecticut number 042-68-4425, which was issued to Harry Bounel, resident of Connecticut, born in 1890.

Her complete April 2nd update on the action appears below:

Update on cases: How decision by Judge Hanen helped American workers and we are waiting to see if Judge Hanen will take on the issue of SSN fraud committed by Obama in light of his use of a stolen CT SSN and in light of massive SSN and IRS fraud that we see in relation to illegal immigration.

Barack Obama tried to provide his donors with cheap labor by his executive amnesty. Judge Hanen in Brownsville, Texas stopped this executive amnesty through his injunction order. We are now seeing amazing positive results for American workers which are related to this order by Judge Hanen. As large corporations see that they will not be able to get cheap foreign labor, they are increasing salaries to keep American workers on the jobs. Shortly after the decision by Judge Hanen, Walmart announced salary increases for low wage workers from $7.25 to $9. This is about 25% increase. Pay increases will also affect higher paid workers. Now, TJ Maxx, Target and Mcdonalds are following in Walmart’s steps.

We are seeing increases in salaries of American workers across the board. This is happening because one judge had the strength of character to stop corruption and lawlessness of Obama regime. I would like to remind the readers that I was the first to file the amnesty challenge before Judge Hanen. I filed my case challenging DACA executive amnesty back in July of 2014. By the time 26 states filed their action, I already had 2 injunction hearings before Judge Hanen and got an order to show cause issued by Judge Hanen to Obama administration, to show cause why he shouldn’t rule in my favor.

Recently, I filed a motion seeking to amend the complaint and include new additional facts, namely the fact that many illegal aliens are using stolen identities, stolen Social Security numbers. I was one of the victims of identity theft as my SSN was stolen according to a written admission by the IRS. When I sought a copy of the fraudulent tax return and request for refund filed by the thief with the IRS, I was denied my request.

I could get the identity of the thief by the bank account number which the thief attached to his request for a refund. By refusing the victims’ requests for fraudulent records filed under their names, IRS is aiding and abetting criminals. Further, Social Security administration is aiding and abetting criminals, when it refuses to provide copies of the original SSN applications when there is evidence of falsification and destruction of a computer record.

I provided Judge Hanen with 150 pages of evidence, some of it under seal, which show that Barack Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Soebarkah is one of the individuals, who is using a stolen Social Security number, namely Connecticut number 042-68-4425, which was issued to Harry Bounel, resident of Connecticut, born in 1890.

Rick Wells is a conservative writer who recognizes that our nation, our Constitution and our traditions are under a full scale assault from multiple threats.”



68 posted on 04/05/2015 10:27:03 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

This May 18, 2011 mp3 interview of professional debt collector (skip tracer) Al (Hendershot) by Chris Wiles is fact filled. Al voted for Obama in 2008 and didn’t have an axe to grind politically. In doing his work tracking down the whereabouts of real estate deadbeats in Chicagoland by using special databases, Al came across Michelle’s tags a number of times. Out of curiosity, he began hunting around and found an incredible tangle of transactions and records he says spells out serious fraud and identity theft by the usurpers in the WH.

http://www.webfilehost.com/?mode=viewupload&id=6113252


69 posted on 04/05/2015 10:47:16 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Verses an incompetent attorney. Defense wins.

That the competence or incompetence of an attorney has any impact on the outcome of what is ostensibly the law, demonstrates a fundamental problem with the whole system.

One would think the law ought not be subjective, that it ought not require such procedural ritual to arrive at a correct result.

70 posted on 04/06/2015 6:25:10 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

It’s a shame that no one has been able to find a local prosecutor who is willing to convene a grand jury to look into the Obamas’ legal issues.
The impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton began with a local Little Rock, Arkansas investigation into the Whitewater Development Corporation and the billing records of Hillary Rodham Clinton of the Rose Law Firm.


71 posted on 04/06/2015 8:57:37 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

Former federal prosecutor Larry Klayman of Judicial Watch did organize citizen grand juries in Ocala, Florida, in 2013. The grand juries indicted Obama, two SCOTUS judges, and IRS officials for a variety of serios offenses.


72 posted on 04/06/2015 12:32:02 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

ed. serious


73 posted on 04/06/2015 12:32:41 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

Citizen grand juries cannot issue LEGALLY BINDING indictments. That’s why persons charged under them, ignore them.

An active, duly elected or appointed prosecutor, be that person a city attorney, a county attorney, a district attorney, a state Attorney General, a Special Prosecutor/Independent Counsel or a U.S. Attorney needs to convene the Grand Jury or formally charge (on their own) a defendant with a crime or crimes.


74 posted on 04/06/2015 4:37:13 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

California attorney, Dr. Orly Taitz, provided notice and objection to President Obama assuming the Office of the President of the United States to the Honorable John Glover Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Chief Justice Roberts was answering questions from audience members after a speech he had delivered earlier at the University of Idaho. Chief Justice Roberts presented himself as an executive level U.S. federal officer performing an unofficial act at a public function that was not a requirement of his duties as an executive level U.S. federal officer. At Chief Justice Roberts’ request, Dr Taitz hand delivered petitions of “half of a million Americans” objecting to the ineligible President Obama to Chief Justice Roberts’ protective detail consisting of U.S. federal government employees of the U.S. Secret Service on March 13, 2009. See “Birther Orly Taitz Confronts Chief Justice John Roberts,” at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbl54phHfE8, site last visited on May 7, 2014. Chief Justice Roberts publicly announced he would read the documents submitted. To date, Chief Justice Roberts has not publicly announced the results of his investigation into the eligibility of President Obama pursuant to the de facto officer doctrine and the Ninth Amendment.

Chief Justice Roberts was approached at a question and answer session after giving a speech at the University of Idaho. Dr. Taitz approached Chief Justice Roberts as an executive level U.S. federal officer of the U.S. Supreme Court to notify him President Obama was ineligible. Pursuant to the de facto officer doctrine, Chief Justice Roberts was obligated as an executive level U.S. federal officer to investigate the claims of petitioner or offer the petitioners an exemption from the laws, rules, regulations, executive orders and appointments of an ineligible president or hold a hearing to determine the eligibility of President Obama. A judge is not immune for actions, though judicial in nature, taken in the complete absence of all jurisdiction. Id., at 356-357; Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall., at 351. All Article III judges waive Absolute immunity, Judicial immunity, qualified immunity or any other immunity, real or imagined, after ignoring notification of ineligibility and failing to offer exemptions or holding a hearing to determine eligibility.

The election of an ineligible President has voided the US Constitution. Time for a convention to establish a national governing document.


75 posted on 04/06/2015 4:38:03 PM PDT by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

And so they did ignore them as expected by Klayman. The point was to raise awareness.


76 posted on 04/06/2015 5:25:10 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

This is how you object to an illegal or ineligible President -Elect:
3 US Code § 15
Congress shall be in session on the sixth day of January succeeding every meeting of the electors. The Senate and House of Representatives shall meet in the Hall of the House of Representatives at the hour of 1 o’clock in the afternoon on that day, and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding officer. Two tellers shall be previously appointed on the part of the Senate and two on the part of the House of Representatives, to whom shall be handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate, all the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and acted upon in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the letter A; and said tellers, having then read the same in the presence and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the votes as they shall appear from the said certificates; and the votes having been ascertained and counted according to the rules in this subchapter provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the President of the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the state of the vote, which announcement shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons, if any, elected President and Vice President of the United States, and, together with a list of the votes, be entered on the Journals of the two Houses. Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate SHALL FOR OBJECTIONS, if any. Every OBJECTION shall be MADE IN WRITING, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received. When all objections so made to any vote or paper from a State shall have been received and read, the Senate shall thereupon withdraw, and such objections shall be submitted to the Senate for its decision; and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, in like manner, submit such objections to the House of Representatives for its decision; and no electoral vote or votes from any State which shall have been regularly given by electors whose appointment has been lawfully certified to according to section 6 of this title from which but one return has been received shall be rejected, but the two Houses concurrently may reject the vote or votes when they agree that such vote or votes have not been so regularly given by electors whose appointment has been so certified. If more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State shall have been received by the President of the Senate, those votes, and those only, shall be counted which shall have been regularly given by the electors who are shown by the determination mentioned in section 5 of this title to have been appointed, if the determination in said section provided for shall have been made, or by such successors or substitutes, in case of a vacancy in the board of electors so ascertained, as have been appointed to fill such vacancy in the mode provided by the laws of the State; but in case there shall arise the question which of two or more of such State authorities determining what electors have been appointed, as mentioned in section 5 of this title, is the lawful tribunal of such State, the votes regularly given of those electors, and those only, of such State shall be counted whose title as electors the two Houses, acting separately, shall concurrently decide is supported by the decision of such State so authorized by its law; and in such case of more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State, if there shall have been no such determination of the question in the State aforesaid, then those votes, and those only, shall be counted which the two Houses shall concurrently decide were cast by lawful electors appointed in accordance with the laws of the State, unless the two Houses, acting separately, shall concurrently decide such votes not to be the lawful votes of the legally appointed electors of such State. But if the two Houses shall disagree in respect of the counting of such votes, then, and in that case, the votes of the electors whose appointment shall have been certified by the executive of the State, under the seal thereof, shall be counted. When the two Houses have voted, they shall immediately again meet, and the presiding officer shall then announce the decision of the questions submitted. No votes or papers from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to the votes or papers from any State shall have been finally disposed of.


77 posted on 04/06/2015 5:46:23 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

Awareness is a good thing. Indictment is a better thing.


78 posted on 04/06/2015 5:47:58 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus (PALIN/CRUZ: 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

To be sure.

If there is a grand jury at some point in the future, the road was paved by Klayman. The evidence presented was mountainous.


79 posted on 04/06/2015 5:55:33 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

Our Constitution will never work when it is not used, but ignored by those in power like our complicit Chief Justice.

The election of an unknown wretch like Barry Soetoro to the presidency made an utter mockery of the Constitution and of the American people who knew better. Those others comprising the American populace just didn’t give a damn. All they wanted was a negro in the White Hut.


80 posted on 04/07/2015 5:04:46 AM PDT by HomerBohn (God is just, but his justice cannot sleep forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson