Replies

California attorney, Dr. Orly Taitz, provided notice and objection to President Obama assuming the Office of the President of the United States to the Honorable John Glover Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Chief Justice Roberts was answering questions from audience members after a speech he had delivered earlier at the University of Idaho. Chief Justice Roberts presented himself as an executive level U.S. federal officer performing an unofficial act at a public function that was not a requirement of his duties as an executive level U.S. federal officer. At Chief Justice Roberts’ request, Dr Taitz hand delivered petitions of “half of a million Americans” objecting to the ineligible President Obama to Chief Justice Roberts’ protective detail consisting of U.S. federal government employees of the U.S. Secret Service on March 13, 2009. See “Birther Orly Taitz Confronts Chief Justice John Roberts,” at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbl54phHfE8, site last visited on May 7, 2014. Chief Justice Roberts publicly announced he would read the documents submitted. To date, Chief Justice Roberts has not publicly announced the results of his investigation into the eligibility of President Obama pursuant to the de facto officer doctrine and the Ninth Amendment.

Chief Justice Roberts was approached at a question and answer session after giving a speech at the University of Idaho. Dr. Taitz approached Chief Justice Roberts as an executive level U.S. federal officer of the U.S. Supreme Court to notify him President Obama was ineligible. Pursuant to the de facto officer doctrine, Chief Justice Roberts was obligated as an executive level U.S. federal officer to investigate the claims of petitioner or offer the petitioners an exemption from the laws, rules, regulations, executive orders and appointments of an ineligible president or hold a hearing to determine the eligibility of President Obama. A judge is not immune for actions, though judicial in nature, taken in the complete absence of all jurisdiction. Id., at 356-357; Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall., at 351. All Article III judges waive Absolute immunity, Judicial immunity, qualified immunity or any other immunity, real or imagined, after ignoring notification of ineligibility and failing to offer exemptions or holding a hearing to determine eligibility.

The election of an ineligible President has voided the US Constitution. Time for a convention to establish a national governing document.

This is how you object to an illegal or ineligible President -Elect:
3 US Code § 15
Congress shall be in session on the sixth day of January succeeding every meeting of the electors. The Senate and House of Representatives shall meet in the Hall of the House of Representatives at the hour of 1 o’clock in the afternoon on that day, and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding officer. Two tellers shall be previously appointed on the part of the Senate and two on the part of the House of Representatives, to whom shall be handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate, all the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and acted upon in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the letter A; and said tellers, having then read the same in the presence and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the votes as they shall appear from the said certificates; and the votes having been ascertained and counted according to the rules in this subchapter provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the President of the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the state of the vote, which announcement shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons, if any, elected President and Vice President of the United States, and, together with a list of the votes, be entered on the Journals of the two Houses. Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate SHALL FOR OBJECTIONS, if any. Every OBJECTION shall be MADE IN WRITING, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received. When all objections so made to any vote or paper from a State shall have been received and read, the Senate shall thereupon withdraw, and such objections shall be submitted to the Senate for its decision; and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, in like manner, submit such objections to the House of Representatives for its decision; and no electoral vote or votes from any State which shall have been regularly given by electors whose appointment has been lawfully certified to according to section 6 of this title from which but one return has been received shall be rejected, but the two Houses concurrently may reject the vote or votes when they agree that such vote or votes have not been so regularly given by electors whose appointment has been so certified. If more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State shall have been received by the President of the Senate, those votes, and those only, shall be counted which shall have been regularly given by the electors who are shown by the determination mentioned in section 5 of this title to have been appointed, if the determination in said section provided for shall have been made, or by such successors or substitutes, in case of a vacancy in the board of electors so ascertained, as have been appointed to fill such vacancy in the mode provided by the laws of the State; but in case there shall arise the question which of two or more of such State authorities determining what electors have been appointed, as mentioned in section 5 of this title, is the lawful tribunal of such State, the votes regularly given of those electors, and those only, of such State shall be counted whose title as electors the two Houses, acting separately, shall concurrently decide is supported by the decision of such State so authorized by its law; and in such case of more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State, if there shall have been no such determination of the question in the State aforesaid, then those votes, and those only, shall be counted which the two Houses shall concurrently decide were cast by lawful electors appointed in accordance with the laws of the State, unless the two Houses, acting separately, shall concurrently decide such votes not to be the lawful votes of the legally appointed electors of such State. But if the two Houses shall disagree in respect of the counting of such votes, then, and in that case, the votes of the electors whose appointment shall have been certified by the executive of the State, under the seal thereof, shall be counted. When the two Houses have voted, they shall immediately again meet, and the presiding officer shall then announce the decision of the questions submitted. No votes or papers from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to the votes or papers from any State shall have been finally disposed of.