Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SteveH

Wrong. The police academies throughout the nation pound this in recruits heads. If your Taser is taken away from you by a suspect or if the suspect has a personal Taser you may use DEADLY FORCE on the suspect.

Personally I think this cop is slime and committed cold blooded murder because he was pissed. Without a video he would have gotten off without a doubt. They will convict him of something, but he might have legal wiggle room.


398 posted on 04/12/2015 3:42:56 PM PDT by BushCountry (If you're wondering, "I got my screenname before GW was elected the first time.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies ]


To: BushCountry

no. that directive cannot be in force forever. for example, if the suspect S takes away officer O’s taser in 2015, drops the taser, gets away, and then O meets S 30 years later by chance, the directive to use deadly force is not a procedural option available for use by O.

this is because the imminent threat no longer exists.

your example is imho typical of cop-think.

that is, apply force (including deadly force) regardless of whether it makes any sense.

are you a cop?


668 posted on 04/13/2015 3:01:44 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies ]

To: BushCountry

and if you are a cop, you have made my point (thanks) that cop training is seriously flawed.


669 posted on 04/13/2015 3:04:09 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson