More importantly, Marco Rubio is a stalking horse for the Jebster.
What difference, at this point, does it make?
In post-Constitutional America anything goes for the elite.
The rules apply only to the peasantry.
An anchor baby is when you use any means possible at the last minute,to drop your baby on this side of the border, such as sneaking in, or flying in pretending to be on vacation, so that you can drop your baby here, as an anchor baby, it does not mean coming in legally and having normal family growth.
That isn’t the situation with Rubio, he is not an anchor baby.
No. From Wikipedia (not the world’s best source for anything but...):
“Rubio was born in Miami, Florida,[2] the second son and third child of Mario Rubio and Oria Garcia. His parents were Cubans who had immigrated to the United States in 1956 and were naturalized as U.S. citizens in 1975”
Vitter tried to get an amendment into the Trafficking bill, but didn’t get any traction.
http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/03/david_vitters_amendment_to_den.html
Since his parents were legal immigrants at the time, little Marco would not technically be considered an anchor baby. His parents didn’t have the need to use their citizen-baby as reason not to be deported.
Personally, as I’ve said before, Rubio should take his parents and family BACK to Cuba. Be rid of him and them. Maybe with Obama normalizing relations, this will be easy return. This Cuba now okay according to Obama, no reason for Rubio and his family to remain in the US. He could help change Cuba.
no he is not. His parents were Cuban refugees escaping a communist prison government.
No, he’s not.
Next question?
“Since Marco Rubio was born in the U.S. to the parents that were not U.S. citizens, does that make him an anchor baby?”
I don’t think so, because his parents weren’t here illegally, they came as refugees.
Are you the same guy who wanted to know if Michelle Malkin was an anchor baby?
Are you a libturd, troll, noob?
Were they here legally at the time? Did they illegally overstay? Or did they play by the rules?
Personally I am more concerned about the dearth of military experience in the family.
Cuban refugees might not have needed an “anchor” per se with refugee policy being what it was.