Posted on 05/20/2015 8:21:56 AM PDT by rightistight
Actually, I’m identifying an omission.
I can accept your indicated word that you do not absolve the false accusation. No problem.
But I also need to let you know that the omission of any indicated support for appropriately punishing that false witness, coupled with the mild “blaming the victim”, lends the impression you don’t hold the woman responsible for her false witness.
We disagree, as you have indicated.
This was not ever a legal issue.
Whom do you think is supposed to mete out the “appropriate punishment”.
Last I checked, libel was still a crime.
He is not suing her for libel.
Does that mean she didn't commit libel?
I don’t know.
That is a legal term for something that is more than just lying about another person.
Than how can you know it was not ever a legal issue?
No only is she a liar, she’s delusional too.
She did not even attempt to press charges.
I don’t know that the supposed rapes were ever reported to police.
I think you’ve lost any sense of context or factual detail on this soap opera.
That would be consistent with only seeing one possible context.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.