[UnwashedPeasant]

It is good news anytime Spielberg makes a new movie.

I wish he had used someone other than Hanks. When Hanks is on the screen, I do not see the character he is portraying, I just see Hanks.

[zeestephen]

So, Obama supporters Spielberg and Hanks are going to explain the Cold War era to me through the eyes of a Hard Line Leftist defense attorney?

Yeah, I'll stand in line to see that.

[Larry381]

Years ago I read a column by Kenneth Lloyd Billingsley called "Hollywood’s Missing Movies".
This piece deals with leftist Hollywood's past (and present) aversion to making movies dealing with any type of anti-communist plot-I urge anyone interested in Hollywood's sordid political past and present, to read it. It's an amazing article.
BTW-I'm not affiliated with the website its on- Reason.com

Hollywood's Missing Movies

[Talisker]

Hanks will take a very noticeable piss in this movie. It’s his “trademark.” He does it in every single one of his movies.

So the question is, just what, exactly, does this represent? More to the point, who, or what, is this mega millionaire Hollywood Leftist pissing ON, over and over and over again?

[DoodleDawg]

I wouldn’t call “Lincoln” all that historical. Well acted, definitely. But as history it had a lot to be desired.