Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/05/2015 8:26:47 AM PDT by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: John Semmens

The judge belittled Davis’ contention that her natural right to freedom of religion was being infringed>>>>>>>>>>>>

We are back to Jim Crow only its against Christians, not black folk.If it keeps up, the Tree of Liberty will be watered.


2 posted on 09/05/2015 8:29:13 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

This ain’t funny anymore.


3 posted on 09/05/2015 8:30:14 AM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

This isn’t semi-satire. Dumb Bunning actually did say that natural law cannot be used in opposition to court will.


4 posted on 09/05/2015 8:32:35 AM PDT by MortMan (The rule of law is now the law of rulings - Judicial, IRS, EPA...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Are those real quotes?


5 posted on 09/05/2015 8:33:25 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

“The judge belittled Davis’ contention that her natural right to freedom of religion was being infringed, saying that “the idea of natural law superseding court authority would be a dangerous precedent.”

God is not mocked .
I would NOT want to be sitting in his shoes


6 posted on 09/05/2015 8:35:41 AM PDT by Lera (Proverbs 29:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

The mere fact that the loving couple after “waiting 11 years” could not drive to the next county to apply for their license should in no way be attributed to their hatefulness or vindictiveness or disregard of their fellow citizens. Nor should the exclusion of an elected county clerk on the basis of her religious beliefs be regarded as setting up a religious test for holding office. Nor should this this unprecedented action of acknowledged severity be considered cruel and unusual punishment; after all, bakers in Colorado(?) have already been fined more than $100,000 for not baking a cake readily available elsewhere and other persons’ livelihoods have been shut down under similar circumstances, so the sky’s the limit on enforcement here. It’s good for a judge to really be able to sink his teeth into somebody’s flesh sometimes.


8 posted on 09/05/2015 8:37:15 AM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson