Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/25/2015 3:40:28 AM PST by Kartographer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: Kartographer

Facts:

1) Except in the very odd/exceptional election year of 1964, the Dems haven’t cracked 50% of the whites in a Presidential election since 1932.

2) Once the ‘64 election was over, the Dems understood that they would never win another Presidential election again unless the Republicans REALLY screwed up...or unless they changed the electorate in a dramatic way.

3) The Dems, courtesy of Bobby Kennedy who wrote the law, and Teddy Kennedy who pushed it in the Senate, passed the 1965 Immigration Act. That law dramatically reduced immigration from our then-traditional large sources of immigrants - England, Ireland, Holland, Germany, etc. - and replaced them with vast numbers of Turd Worlders...whom everyone knows vote around 80% for Dems, and will continue to do so for the rest of their lives, as new immigrants have traditionally done.

4) As a result of the ‘65 Act, and due to the Dem’s outright lying in ‘86 regarding an effective (or any) fence, there are now probably 30 - 40 million illegals in this nation. Note that the (probably low-ball) figure in 2005 was 11 million...we have 2-3 million come in every year, so simple math says that the number is actually somewhere between 31 and 41 million). If any substantial portion of these people ever become citizens, then the Dems will have accomplished a complete shift of the electorate, and will be virtually invincible on the national level. Every state will become like California, both politically and economically - which is to say, overwhelming Dem and broke. But at least if you don’t like California now, you can leave for a better place without much trouble - where are you going to go if EVERY state is like that?

5) Every Republican, and every Conservative voter MUST UNDERSTAND that if such a state of affairs comes to be, NO OTHER ISSUE WILL MATTER AT ALL, because we will ALWAYS AND FOREVER lose on those issues. Immigration is THE issue of this election, and this election is as critical as the 1860 election was - and for the same reason, because it will determine whether this nation continues on as it has existed in the past, or becomes a new and unrecognizable entity that simply occupies the same geographic territory.

Please wake up, and help others to do so by sending them this post (or recommending “Adios America” to them). It really is THAT important.


2 posted on 11/25/2015 3:42:00 AM PST by Ultima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

Rush is right of course but Trump MAY be the only candidate able to get us going in the right direction. Something to think about folks.


3 posted on 11/25/2015 3:43:03 AM PST by rrrod (just an old guy with a gun in his pocket.l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

“Limbaugh explained, that “compared to Reagan, Trump is not a conservative, and the bulk of Trump’s support is not the Republican base.”

I thought I heard that discussion yesterday. I don’t remember him saying that. This is out of context.


4 posted on 11/25/2015 3:43:44 AM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

Only the constitution matters to me and anyone who doesn’t put it first and foremost will never ever get my vote period.


6 posted on 11/25/2015 3:47:18 AM PST by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

There are dozens of examples Limbaugh could have used where Trump demonstrated during this campaign that he does not think or approach problems in conservative terms let alone understand them and is unable to bring them up.. But views challanges in a very personal way

From the outset his battles with Fox and Kelly and then Trump going on CNN following the debate when he could have cited how the press abused Palin as well as other conservatives started bringing up Kellys body functions.

Trumps exchange with Jorge (Univision). Trump could have asked him if he believes Mexico has legitimate claim to American states as well as bring up Mexican treatment of illegals. Then asking why should the US permit land ownership when legal American retirees cannot own land in their own name or vote there.

The way the Mexicans are treating Americans should be the issue and would dump the quote hispanic unquote krap.


25 posted on 11/25/2015 4:24:23 AM PST by mosesdapoet (My best insights get lost in FR's because of meaningless venting no one reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

That may well be true, but Regan was a man of his day as The Donald is a man of his day.


27 posted on 11/25/2015 4:26:35 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

Trump maybe the only candidate willing to declare US bankrupt. I don’t see Cruz or any other candidate willing to do this


30 posted on 11/25/2015 4:33:49 AM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer
'Compared To Reagan, Trump Is Not A Conservative'.

Oh No!!!


34 posted on 11/25/2015 4:37:46 AM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

Trump is like Reagan!

Not that he is a conservative but he’s just what this country needs at the time. “We will will be winning so much that you are going to get bored of it.”


37 posted on 11/25/2015 4:42:17 AM PST by McGruff (Those that fail to learn from history, are doomed to repeat it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

Something you have to remember about Rush....He has a hard time with the recognizing a conservative. In ‘08 he noted that Romney represented the 3 legs of conservatism. http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2008/02/04/one_candidate_now_stands_for_all_three_legs_of_conservatism


38 posted on 11/25/2015 4:43:20 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer
If so-called "conservatives" start litmus tests like this tends to do, they'll end up with a GOPe conservative, and I put the paid candidates into that mix, AND THEY WILL LOSE THE ELECTION. Think about it, do you want a candidate that gets 100% of the "conservative" "Republican" base and ZERO of the remaining electorate? Is so, if being a martyr is more important than winning an election, go for it.

If you want to beat the Democrats, rally to Trump, not tear him down.

Else tell me how any of the other remaining candidates win? You eliminate Trump, you are left with Bush, Rubio, and Christi vs. Cruz vs. a lot of even worse polling people. Sorry, in that mix, I bet amnesty-loving Rubio wins.

So, is Trump conservative enough on the important issues? YES. Tell me which issue he is not conservative enough and how that single issue is worth throwing the election away?

41 posted on 11/25/2015 4:46:39 AM PST by Reno89519 (American Lives Matter! US Citizen, Veteran, Conservative, Republican. I vote. Trump 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer
Trump is outing everyone, even Limbaugh who is really a libertarian and not conservative.

I don't think in the 'big' scheme of things Rush really cares about borders, illegal immigration, H-1B, off shoring, de industrialization and gloBULLism in general. These things do not bother a libertarian, like Rush.

I would argue that a strong nationalist/populist is closer to conservatism than a libertarian.

51 posted on 11/25/2015 5:06:39 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer
the bulk of Trump's support is not the Republican base.

The same base of retards who gave us Denny Hastert and Laura Bush?

And this is somehow supposed to be bad news for Trump… really?

66 posted on 11/25/2015 5:22:18 AM PST by greedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

As I read through these replies I am struck by how many trumpeter swans have twisted themselves into such a pretzel in an effort to convince themselves that Trump is who he SAYS he is that rather than debate (accept really...on this there is no debate) what Limbaugh is saying, they choose to attack the messenger. I observed this on a different thread too. The cult of personality is horrifically strong with Trump.

And all because he says he’s going to deport the illegals...which will not ever happen. If his ass makes it to the hot seat, the media fed public outcry will not allow it.


72 posted on 11/25/2015 5:32:08 AM PST by Axeslinger (Where has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

Dear: Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage and those of your similar professional circle.

After the fiasco that was Mitt Romney, for over two years each of you at one point or another have called for the broader conservative electorate, the generalized right or center-right, to unite in support behind one candidate who can defeat the leftist advancement and larger progressive agenda.

While railing at drive-bys, corporate interests, manufactured politics and various catch phrases, you have engaged a national audience and delivered opinion.

Did you actually mean it ?

Or was that all BULLSHIT ?

Because for the past six months a Republican front-runner has not only emerged, but has worked his ass off to earn the massive support he holds.

Have you noticed a campaign rally for Ted Cruz with 10,000+ in attendance? Have you seen Democrats switching parties just so they can support Marco Rubio? Are there grass roots websites helping Jeb-Democrats to register as primary supporting Republicans?

See the point?

Have you noticed another, as in any other candidate, willing to put his butt on the line to unapologetically discuss, advocate and advance the same issues important to your audience?

Well?

For six months only one candidate has waged war, when needed, against a corrupt industrial media complex in order to insure the delivery of his message, our message.

Only one candidate has pushed forward against the strongest adversaries in the media -forcing them to engage in policies, platforms and issue discussion they would never allow- and never backing down, always forward.

For six months only one candidate has put his entire brand, reputation, financials and honor at risk – with zero self-benefit as an outcome of the effort. For six months one candidate has campaigned for the most support, generated the most excitement and coalesced the largest base.

One candidate. Working exhaustively.

Have you seen another candidate with polling showing such diversity in support? Have you seen 25%-40% black support for Cruz, or Rubio, or Jeb? Does anyone else carry such a consequential broad base?

No, and no you haven’t.

Have you seen any other candidate lead the polls amid 18-32 year-olds with such dominance?

Have you seen another candidate hold so many campaign rallies in all of the important states? with packed audiences? with filled arenas? with thousands-upon-thousands in attendance? day-after-day-after day, often in the same week?

Have you seen another candidate’s audience response so committed, so engaged, so enthusiastic?

No, no you haven’t.

Have you seen any other candidate directly align with the principles and positions of the majority of the patriotic working class, the middle class, The American Class?

Have you seen any other candidate willing to take on Tom Donohue and the parasitic U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which is no longer representing national best interests but promoting globalist best interests ?

No, no you haven’t.

Have you seen any other candidate who is not beholding to the financial corporate interests of Wall Street?

Have you noticed any other candidate with such overwhelming real and grass-roots financial support from Main Street?

No, being honest with yourself, you haven’t noticed that either.

So what is it exactly you are advocating for. You advocated for a specific action – for center-right Americans to come together and support a single candidate. These words were spoken by each of you, repeatedly, over the broadcast airways for the past several years.

These are YOUR WORDS, not ours – YOURS.

While coming together we have been ridiculed, marginalized, assaulted, called names, belittled, disregarded, attacked, besmirched and ignored. We battled through, and retained our assembly.

So here we stand. Millions of us – right here in a big, broad, united group; the largest single mass of people in the entire center-right country; standing directly in front of you, just like you asked; and we have selected our candidate.

As we stand here staring directly at you, we present a single question:

Well?

We are currently tuned-in, reading, watching, and listening to the various punditry saying the Republican Party is now collectively engaged in destroying the person we support and have outlined above.

We’ve done our part. Now it’s time for YOU to put your effort where your mouth was – put every single one of those Republican Donors and Operatives on notice….

Or, was everything you said previously – just BULLSHIT?

Please advise.

Warmest regards,

America

cc: #ColdAnger

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/11/23/open-letter-to-limbaugh-levin-ingraham-hannity-savage-et-al/


85 posted on 11/25/2015 6:36:42 AM PST by HarleyLady27 (I have such happy days, I hope you do too!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

I have never voted for a Dem...er, Marxocrat in my long life, for any office, at any level. I’ve voted every year since I’ve been eligible, which is over 40 years. I have voted for scumbag Repubs time and time again because, as I foolishly told myself, over and over, they were “the lesser of two evils”. After witnessing the collapse of my country during the Hussein era with the complicity of the Repubs, I decided that voting was now a farce and a charade, just like it must have been in Soviet Russia. I was determined not to vote at all, but watched with interest what Cruz was accomplishing. Then Donald Trump surfaced and blew the lid off the entire, sordid mess that is contemporary American politics. I have now decided to leave Cruz behind and go “all in” for Trump. And I am a Christian, Catholic, college graduate, US Navy veteran, retired IT professional. Rush Limbaugh is making a claim that can’t be substantiated.


87 posted on 11/25/2015 6:38:22 AM PST by DrPretorius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

Trump’s policy objectives and the manner in which he intends to carry them out are more conservative than any other candidate. Trump has the ability to win and that is the clincher for me. No Trump option and we will be watching Clinton being inaugurated .


88 posted on 11/25/2015 6:39:31 AM PST by free_life (If you ask Jesus to forgive you and to save you, He will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

Of course, Trump not being a conservative is not news, but Rush saying it so plainly is. It would be difficult to believe anyone is surprised by Rush stating the obvious.


89 posted on 11/25/2015 6:39:47 AM PST by FourPeas (Tone matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer; All
Here's the quote

"As we mentioned yesterday, if you look at the demographics, at least as expressed polling data, the bulk of Trump support is what we all have been led to believe the Republican Party wants: blue-collar people, moderates and independents," suggested Limbaugh. "I mean there's the fact that they don't control Trump, and the real thing is they don't have any money invested, and as such they have no say-so over what he does at all."

Limbaugh claimed, "There's a genuine adversarial relationship. It isn't new, folks, but it keeps intensified. I mean, the adversarial relationship was plain as day back in the in the '70s when Reagan was attempting to become the Republican nominee, and the establishment Republicans of that day had similar animus to Reagan, and they did their best to discredit Reagan with his supporters."

105 posted on 11/25/2015 7:49:29 AM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kartographer

I’m a white Mississippian who lives in Nashville surround county

A state where that demographic votes 90% GOP

And almost all my extended clan of over 100 family and friends support Trump to varying degrees

Trump and Cruz

If that’s not the base I don’t know what is

Ditto how folks I know in TN feel

Rush needs to get off EIB-ONE and drive around and reacquaint with the nation


106 posted on 11/25/2015 7:58:21 AM PST by wardaddy (Save western civilization and save the world....lose it & it's a dark ages unknown to human history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson