Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sioux-san

I definitely agree that candidates should be vetted, and vetted based on consistent criteria.

So, if one criterion that is established in law is that both parents must be American citizens for a person to run for president, so be it.

If another criterion is that one is natural born if born in another country to American citizen parents, then that too should be followed.

I think there’s a lot of back and forth on this issue because there has not been any recent court ruling on what “natural born” means relating to the presidency. I don’t know if there’s ever been a ruling anytime in history on that subject.

Agreed that this issue should be resolved in some reasonable way. Realistically I think such resolution will have to come from the federal courts.


34 posted on 01/31/2016 11:35:36 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego; Sioux-san
I think there’s a lot of back and forth on this issue because there has not been any recent court ruling on what “natural born” means relating to the presidency.

I think the fact that we have lost our sense of what "American" means, is the root of the problem. Have we forgotten? If we know what an American is (is this still found in some form in our naturalization tests for prospective citizens?) we will certainly know what a natural-born American citizen is. Do any schools today ask their students as part of civics/American history to take the citizenship test, just to get an idea of the process?

37 posted on 01/31/2016 12:48:54 PM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson