Posted on 03/05/2016 5:11:37 AM PST by IBD editorial writer
Election 2016: If Hillary Clinton’s increasingly reckless attempts to spin conspiracy theories are any indication, she’s far more worried about her email scandal than she lets on. Witness her recent attempts to smear independent investigators.
(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...
I heard some time back that there are 200 FBI agents investigating the Clinton Foundation, separate from the emails. We’ll see. But I’ve never heard of a DOJ investigation of this size not ending up with indictments.
The act of spying to obtain another nations secrets is espionage.
The act of supplying secrets to other nations is treason, pure and simple.
Nathan Hale was hanged by the British for espionage.
Benedict Arnold engaged in treason, the betrayal of his country. His reward would have been the rope.
Stark lessons.
I hope the skank gets what she deserves. I can dream, can’t I?
Does ANYONE proofread any more?
Or does SpelChek rule?
The Rat is being cornered.
No, you can’t even get correct usage and grammer from a national newspaper. Idiocracy was a documentary.
EVEN BEFORE HER INFAMOUS UN PRESSER-—Fox has Hillary on video wherein Hillary tells an earlier tech conference in California: “I have, you know, an iPad, a mini iPad, an iPhone and a Blackberry.”
Did Hillary delete pertinent e-mails while subject to congressional investigation?
THE NYT REPORTED 3/27/15: Clinton’s review (and erasing?) of her emails did not occur when she was secretary of state ......or even shortly after she left office.
Last October, nearly two years after she left office, the State Department sent her a letter requesting all government records, like emails, she may have possessed. In response, she provided the State Department in December with about 30,000 printed emails that she said were government records. She has said that an additional 30,000 emails were personal.
It appears Clinton still has copies of the emails she deemed public records. Attached to Mr. Kendall’s letter was one sent to him by the State Department this week.
A letter from the under secretary of state for management, Patrick F. Kennedy, said that the department understood that she wanted to keep copies of those documents. Mr. Kennedy said that the agency had consulted with the National Archives, and that allowing her “access to the documents is in the public interest as it will promote informed discussion” as she responds to congressional and other inquiries.
ADDENDUM-—The State Dept may also be facing charges of misleading a court WRT the court’s request for documents...and for tampering w/ evidence.
Cong Jason Chaffetz, Trey Gowdy and Sen Grassley need to start w/ the federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB)-—theagency which funds the offices of ex-presidents:
<><> get the documents which list Sen and Secy Hillary’s govt-issue electronic devices.....and whether they were returned;
<><> the entire range of tax-paid outlays to finance ex-pres Clinton....including electronics at his Harlem presidential office, his home in Chappaqua, hand-held devices in his possession....and ISP bills and records.
PIC Circa 2010--Ex-Pres Clinton in Moscow having a laugh w/ Putin as strategic US uranium deposits were sold off to Russia for Big Bucks.
"Hahahaha. US ntl security? Hahahaha. You gotta be kidding, Vlad."
====================================================
With all the top-level intel available to him, does Obama think Americans actually believe:
<><>Obama was oblivious to the Clintons jerking around US foreign policy?
<><> Obama knew nothing of Hillary and Sid Blumenthal's emails WRT Iran (the man Obama banned from US govt employment)?
<><> Obama knew nothing about the Clinton Foundation/slush fund buck-raking activities?
<><> Obama never noticed Bill Clinton trotting around the globe?
<><> Obama never noticed the Clinton "charity" used to worm his way into the confidences of foreign leaders.... but only those leaders w/ untapped reserves of gold, uranium, oil, and other valuable commodities?
<><> Obama never knew Hillary's brother got a gold-mining permit in Haiti?
Hand-picked by Obama to run State, Hillary ran it like a shadow govt.... w/ her husband taking notes WRT buck-raking opportunities available from Hillary's actions OR inaction.
Secy Hillary never e-v-e-r uttered a discouraging word e-v-e-r......as the Clinton Foundation sucked up hundred of millions of foreign dollars from shady characters
On 3/3/16, the NYT reported that as part of the FBI’s investigation of the email scandal, the Bureau is comparing electronic time stamps on classified sources. They hope thereby to figure out whether Clinton aides reviewed the sources and then retyped the info into emails that were sent or forwarded to the Secy’s private server.
Catherine Herridge and Pamela Browne of Fox News suggest that this is part of an effort to determine how sensitive intelligence “jumped the gap” between the classified systems and Clinton’s unsecured personal server. Herridge and Browne were told that there are several possible ways classified information got onto Clinton’s server:
<> Reading intelligence reports or briefings, and then summarizing the findings in emails sent on Clinton’s unsecured personal server.
<> Accessing the classified intelligence computer network, and then lifting sections by typing them verbatim into a device such as an iPad or BlackBerry.
<> Taking pictures of a computer screen to capture the intelligence.
<> Using a thumb drive or disk to physically move the intelligence, but this would require access to a data center.
It’s unclear whether Clinton’s former IT specialist Bryan Pagliano, who. . .has reached an immunity deal with the Justice Department, or others had sufficient administrator privileges to physically transfer data.
According to Herridge and Browne, most of these scenarios would require a password. Moreover, all of these practices would be strictly prohibited under non-disclosure agreements signed by Clinton and others, and federal law. (Excerpt) Read more at powerlineblog.com ...
Saw this sign on a rural road in Oregon:
Is Hillary, too big to jail?
If the message is bad, do what Tigranes II did.
Great sign—that is the bottom line—she is too big to jail.
The Clintons are a crime family. They have been engaged in shaking down international leaders and business for decades.
During the 1990s a White House staffer compiled an “eyes only” list of Clinton scandals. The list had almost a hundred items. What was most amazing was that _no one_ outside the Clinton team had even heard of about ninety of them. Most of them were criminal activities that would have sent average folks to jail for a long term for each offense.
The notion of the Justice Department bringing down large scale organized crime is great stuff for movies but very rare in the real world.
I think the Hillary group didn’t “send or receive”- they probably had stuff saved in drafts or another folder then they would each sign in to that account to retrieve the info.
Well, unless she is successful at pinning it on some other flunky like the service provider or the guy who just got immunity.
What a windhag.
Not much. But even when I proofread, which I try to do regularly, I've noticed that spell check has the secret power of dulling my acuity. IOW, because words are correctly spelled our brains seem to ignore the incorrect context.
“If the plan is to bring Biden in, most likely they’ll wait until Hillary has enough delegates to secure the nomination. At that point, they can drop the hammer on her and force her out of the race. Her delegates will then be free to vote for whoever they want, thereby denying Bernie the nomination in favor of Biden. “
That’s it. Or, a serious “health issue” will arise forcing her to sadly drop out.
“No, you can’t even get correct usage and grammer from a national newspaper. Idiocracy was a documentary.”
...what about spelling. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
