Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's Time for Scope of Practice Reform
Michigan Capitol Confidential ^ | 4/11/2016 | Kahryn Riley

Posted on 04/12/2016 1:41:39 PM PDT by MichCapCon

Michigan faces a widespread shortage of primary health care providers, and state rules on midlevel health care providers have held up a valuable solution to this problem. Nurse practitioners and physician assistants offer competent care in more locations and at a lower cost than physicians, but these professionals are limited by protectionist restrictions known as “scope of practice” rules. Policymakers should loosen these restrictions to make health care services easier to obtain and afford.

Scope of practice restrictions are defended as an attempt to raise standards of care by limiting the range of procedures a medical professional is licensed to perform. They also impose extensive training requirements, limit a professional’s ability to write prescriptions, and require costly annual license fees. A growing body of scholarship shows that the restrictions do more harm than good for patients and consumers.

New research is discovering that scope of practice restrictions result in higher costs by artificially increasing the income of providers through a rationing scheme that does nothing to improve the quality of care. The research indicates that access to care is improved when nurse practitioners and physician assistants can offer more procedures and operate more independently than current laws allow.

A working paper from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University in Virginia shows how restrictions on nurse practitioners and physician assistants raise health care costs. Expanding the scope of their practices reduces the cost of Medicaid outpatient claims by 11 percent, and improves patients’ access to health care with little effect on quality.

Access to affordable care will improve when we streamline regulations that allow physicians to delegate patient care to physician assistants. Michigan expanded the scope of practice for physician assistants in 2011. That reform enjoyed broad support within the health care industry, which lauded it as an important step toward greater efficiency and effectiveness in delivering care, but policymakers should not stop there.

In Michigan, a majority of counties are designated as Primary Medical Care Health Professional Shortage Areas by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which compiled a list of counties with a higher-than-average ratio of residents per physician. The demand for nurse practitioners and physician assistants has grown tremendously in recent decades because, without these midlevel providers, many patients in underserved areas would get no care at all. Lawmakers should rely on the professional judgment of active practitioners and craft policies that enable nurse practitioners and physician assistants to help meet the needs of Michigan patients.


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: abortion; deathpanels; doctors; obamacare; zerocare

1 posted on 04/12/2016 1:41:39 PM PDT by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

I wonder what the quality of medical services are like in the depressed ‘jobs went south’ areas.


2 posted on 04/12/2016 1:51:20 PM PDT by Fhios (Going Donald Trump is as close to going John Galt as we'll get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon
Nurse practitioners and physician assistants offer competent care in more locations and at a lower cost than physicians, but these professionals are limited by protectionist restrictions known as “scope of practice” rules.

I would predict that the businsess of medical malpractice attorneys will show double-digit growth should reforms like this go through.

3 posted on 04/12/2016 3:24:48 PM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

In fact, the cynic that I am, I would be surprised if the tort bar wasn’t behind this effort.


4 posted on 04/12/2016 3:26:26 PM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

No no and no. The NPs and PAs (advanced practice nurses) that I know do NOT want the scope of practice enlarged or changed. It is their worst nightmare


5 posted on 04/12/2016 3:37:58 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Doctor work for nurse pay.

Throw in some additional liability.


6 posted on 04/12/2016 5:25:21 PM PDT by americas.best.days... ( I think we can now say that they are behind us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon
...these professionals are limited by protectionist restrictions known as “scope of practice” rules...also known as standards for better clinical practice and outcomes because of superior training, practicum, and experience.....
7 posted on 04/12/2016 5:30:37 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americas.best.days...

And without Doctor training


8 posted on 04/12/2016 6:54:00 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon

This is all about ObamaCare trying to cut out doctors and give nurses the ability to prescribe drugs.


9 posted on 04/13/2016 5:45:38 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam should be banned and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson