That is why the feminist campaign worker who tweeted that out as an anti-Trump tweet thought it was bad for Trump. But reality Trumps feminist faux outrages.
Trump is going to beat Hillary Clinton like the rented establishment mule she is.
Hillary is dumber than Jeb.
She hits like a girl.
I've been staying away from these Trump threads as much as possible lately. The reason being is I believe that Shillary with all her political experience will devastate Trump in debates with her decades of spinning, parsing, redirection, misleading, avoidance, and outright lying. Poor in-articulate Donald who just repeats himself just seconds later will be out-matched. I wouldn't be surprised if he stuck another foot in his mouth during their debates.
That is why I supported Cruz, who has been know to argue legal points to the USSC and win. Still, I and the wife will vote for Trump in the hopes that he appoints the best people for his cabinet, as he has done in his business life. I would not at all mind him being a figure-head with true conservatives in his Cabinet and following their advice. He can choose whoever VP that gets him the most electoral votes, but the Cabinet positions and agency positions will be the true test of his acumen.
Last point: Isn't it time for presidential candidates start discussing the differences between socialism and capitalism/free enterprise? Hillary, being a socialist, promises more for the "little people". Trump promises the same ole reduction of taxes and regulations.
Okay. But I'm tired of hearing promises. Let's have an open debate about ideology. If Trump were to point out the failing of socialism around the world ( currently Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Greece, South Africa, European Union, not to mention the Soviet Union), he may make the University mush-filled youths think some. It's time we have that debate about socialism always failing.
My hero, Margaret Thatcher: "Socialism only works until you run out of other people's money".
Feminists don’t want equal treatment they want affirmative action.
The median male worker earns 6% less in real terms than he did in 1973. The median female worker earns 25% more.
Yes, this is interesting! Apparently HRC and the rest of her harridans think that women are entitled to equal pay regardless of performance, and FURTHER they believe that everyone believes that as well.
The same HRC who pays her female employees 70% as much as males, on her campaign staff as well as at her criminal enterprise the Clinton Global Initiative.
The answer is to put in place 100nof thousands different rankings that can be changed quarterly depending on a person value to a company