Hero
Posted on 05/18/2016 4:34:15 PM PDT by Ray76
The Venezuelan economy is buckling1 under the weight of its severe socialist policies, and even as its president admits to a nationwide economic emergency2, the government continues to affirm the drivers behind the collapse, blaming low oil prices and global capitalism instead.
This was supposed to be the dawn of “21st-century socialism,” as the late President Hugo Chavez proclaimed3 over 10 years ago, complete with the right tweaks and upgrades to its materialistic, mechanistic approach to the human person. “We have assumed the commitment to direct the Bolivarian Revolution towards socialism,” he said, “and to contribute to the socialist path, with a new socialism…which is based in solidarity, in fraternity, in love, in justice, in liberty, and in equality.”
Alas, with a shrinking economy, booming inflation, violent outbreaks, and empty food shelves, “21st-century socialism” is feeling mighty nostalgic in all the wrong ways.
In the years before Chavez, the country was in better shape than much of the continent4. Now, thanks to the temptations of centralized power, the arrogance of centralized planners, and a series of faux upgrades to age-old bad ideas, the nation is crumbling. The oil prices simply served as the messenger.
Over at The Atlantic5, Moisés Naím and Francisco Toro offer a striking summary of the situation, including a range of stirring stories and reflections. For them, this is far more than a mere blip in market fluctuation:
Developing countries, like teenagers, are prone to accidents. One pretty much expects them to suffer an economic crash, a political crisis, or both, with some regularity. The news coming from Venezuela—including shortages as well as, most recently, riots over blackouts6; the imposition of a two-day workweek7 for government employees, supposedly aimed at saving electricity; and an accelerating drive to recall the president8—is dire, but also easy to dismiss as representing just one more of these recurrent episodes.
That would be a mistake. What our country is going through is monstrously unique: It’s nothing less than the collapse of a large, wealthy, seemingly modern, seemingly democratic nation just a few hours’ flight from the United States.
As for why all of this has happened, the reasons are varied and complex. But as Naím and Toro explain, the core problems are primarily a result of top-down control and mismanagement:
It’s not that the country lacked money. Sitting atop the world’s largest reserves of oil9 at the tail end of a frenzied oil boom, the government led first by Chavez and, since 2013, by Maduro, received over a trillion dollars in oil revenues10 over the last 17 years. It faced virtually no institutional constraints on how to spend that unprecedented bonanza. It’s true that oil prices have since fallen—a risk many people foresaw, and one that the government made no provision for11—but that can hardly explain what’s happened: Venezuela’s garish implosion began well before the price of oil plummeted. Back in 2014, when oil was still trading north of $100 per barrel12, Venezuelans were already facing acute shortages13 of basic things like bread or toiletries.
A case in point is the price controls, which have expanded to apply to more and more goods: food and vital medicines, yes, but also car batteries, essential medical services, deodorant, diapers, and, of course, toilet paper. The ostensible goal was to check inflation and keep goods affordable for the poor, but anyone with a basic grasp of economics could have foreseen the consequences: When prices are set below production costs, sellers can’t afford to keep the shelves stocked. Official prices are low, but it’s a mirage: The products have disappeared.
From here, we are led to the tangible heartbreak, including stories ranging from widespread hunger to poor healthcare to the surprisingly serious problem of toilet-paper theft. We should pray for Venezuela: not only that they would find immediate relief, but that this grand, failing social experiment would cease.
So what might we learn from such a situation?
Although the problems we face in the United States are distinct in their scope and scale, given the current crop of presidential candidates and the popularity they’ve enjoyed thus far, we would do well to pause and exude some caution toward “upgrades” such as these.
Bernie Sanders is at the top of this hill, of course, what with his full and shameless embrace of so-called “democratic socialism”14 (sound familiar, Hugo15?). Regardless of its peculiar and ill-fitted definition16, we see an appetite to accelerate those same drivers of the Venezuelan collapse: trigger-happy price fixing, massive social programs, manipulations to currency, nationalization of corporations and industries, and the rest.
The logical conclusions of all of this have colored recent history with big, dark strokes, filling plenty of gulags and graveyards in the process. But for those not paying attention, it’s now on display once again.
Will Bernie’s league of converts pay attention?
The hard lessons of communism and socialism were learned long ago, but as we remember their brutal byproducts, let’s also resist these attempts to add “21-century” frosting to base authoritarianism, wherever and however it sprouts.
Did y’all ever hear about Venezuela paying Danny Glover 20 million dollars a decade ago to produce a propaganda movie touting their great socialist paradise? And that he stiffed them and never delivered on it?
Bernie's supporters wlll say we should wipe our ass with our hands.
ZACTLY.
Usins `meracun socialists are waaaaaay smarter than them veniswaylin socialists.
.
A liberal admitting to the fact that they were wrong has never happened in my lifetime. Temper tantrums, scream, yell, call everyone they disagree names, change the subject . . . but never ever admit they were wrong. Not in their DNA.
No, because they will ignore Venezuela and just point to the glorious Scandinavian countries being overrun by Muslims and say “let’s be like them!”
The answer is no. Because as any good socialist knows, the answer to failed socialism is more socialism.
I doesn’t seem to have reduced the numbers of those, “feelin’ the Bern”. Morons.
Maduro is still eating well. That’s the lesson they will learn.
Your remark is so true. For 40-50 years those of us who have followed the folly of socialism have heard “It just wasn’t done right! We’ll do it right.”
40% plus of the American population is all in for marxisism.
They need to be straightened out, by ANY means necessary.
Make being a marxist in America DANGEROUS again.
Hero
Why do commies, more often than not, tie their so-called "revolution" to the memories of men far greater than them?
Why should Simon Bolivar's life and leadership lye besmirched amongst the thugocracy of the Chavistas? who took a country still abundantly resource filled, and turned it into the true hell hole it has become.
Berneyrians, take heed.
Watch the MSM ?
No coverage at all
That alone says everything that needs to be said
5th Column will be exposed!
But Bernie -as he often reminds us - is a “democratic” socialist. Not your average Bolshevik that Bernie fellow, and Venezuela, well they were not democratic, I mean they did not have elections, did they? They did? You mean they elected Chavez and Maduro?
So they were/are democratic socialists, like Bernard Sanders, ugh.
Nobel Prize winning economist, F A Hayak, wrote nearly 70 years ago that socialism was nothing but a road to serfdom. However on many college campuses, academics believe that even communism works if the right people are in charge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.