Posted on 06/09/2016 6:37:48 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Shameless...Do you really want four years of this?
I think in describing the type of liar Hillary is, we sometimes toss around the word “shameless” just because it seems like a good all-purpose adjective - without necessarily thinking about what it means or why it applies. Here’s a perfect case in point. The shamelessness of her lying has to do with the fact that she will say things so completely absurd that anyone who thinks about it for even a second will shake their head and ask, “Did she really just say that?”
But Rule 1 of lying in ClintonWorld is that no one really cares all that much about the thing you’re lying about, so even if your lie is transparently absurd, lie away! The conservative alternative media will yelp about it for a day or two, but after that no one will even remember.
She’s a Clinton and a democrat, so she is, therefore, above the law.
Trump should continue to call her a criminal deserving of being in prison. He should recruit Chris Christie to work up a legal argument against her for her mishandling of classified information, and her corruption.
Herself has not “talked about” the obvious problem, what has been heard is merely obfuscation and what was once known as a “red herring”.
The term arises from charges by the House Committee on Un-American Activities and by Senator Joseph R. McCarthy of Wisconsin that the administration was “coddling Communists” within the government, especially in the State Department. Truman angrily denounced these allegations as a “red herring.”
Dragging a market fish known as red herring back and forth across a trail being followed by bloodhounds was intended to confuse the hounds and throw them off the scent. And that is exactly the tactic that Herself is using, by trying to throw those in pursuit of the truth about dealings in the State Department and through the Clinton Family Foundation off the blood trail.
And yes, there is blood involved.
But not under oath....
She picked Bret for a reason,do you think she’d let Hannity within a 100 yards of the queen?
I predict HRC will not agree to be interviewed by the FBI. Legally, it is not in her best interest to do so.”
Martha Stewart went to prison for lying to the FBI over some innocuous infraction. Clinton would have to tell the truth for once or go to jail, which may be a shorter sentence than what she could really be charged with.
In the upcoming debates Trump must not allow the moderators to softball Hillary . He should ask them why don’t you ask Hillary how she stands on her numerous ongoing legal problems and corrupt hedge fund foundation etc . He should force them to go after her many , many problems past and present . I know the moderators will not go there unless preempted or cornered into doing so .
Exactly. That was a worthless interview by Baier. Clinton just filibustered out the time allotted for the interview. Baier never pointed out that Clinton's use of a private server was a first by a Sec. of State.
I’m sick of all of them over at Fox. I don’t watch Hannity because I give up on the news by seven o’clock.
Under oath? [cackle] No, I made my public remarks where truth is not required.
Of course not! I’ve been listening to his radio show but since he thought it was instructive or amusing to play 5 minutes of audio of her screaming at the top of his three hours, I’ve had to turn him off, as well. He’s excellent on this election, though.
In defense of Bret, who does try to be polite and respectful of any guest (even if they don't deserve it), she only talked louder when he tried to get a word in edgewise. FOX is less pathetic that most other networks who have yet to ask HRC anything more controversial than "How does it feel to be the first woman nominated to head the top of the ticket of a major political party?".
Yeah - the public arena is not legally binding....
Oh, you mean the man who bragged that he would lead Trump from the stage of the first debate if he ‘acted up’ is polite and respectful? Sorry, I’m not buying. And I saw the interview.
Another way that Obama is complicit in her crimes and therefore has to protect her to protect himself.
I saw the interview also. That's how I know Hillary kept raising her voice until Bret stopped trying to talk over her. I record Bret's show every night so I know that he does try to be civil to anyone who is a guest on his show. A debate is a different situation entirely and I did not even watch one entire debate the whole primary season. A "debate" with that many candidates is an absolute waste of time. A debate between Hillary and Trump one on one will be a different matter!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.