Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/06/2016 3:48:47 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

Good luck with that


2 posted on 07/06/2016 3:52:54 PM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Attorneys Intend to Ask for ‘the Clinton Deal’”

It usually requires a transfer of a large amount of cash.


3 posted on 07/06/2016 3:54:34 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

...and the culture further erodes.


4 posted on 07/06/2016 3:55:37 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Little people think they are so smart.


5 posted on 07/06/2016 3:59:17 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Nonsense.

The applicable legal principle is: Quod licet Jovi, non licet bovi.

The ox doesn't get the same treatment as Jupiter.

6 posted on 07/06/2016 4:05:37 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Nonsense.

The applicable legal principle is: Quod licet Jovi, non licet bovi.

The ox doesn't get the same treatment as Jupiter.

7 posted on 07/06/2016 4:05:37 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They won’t get it because the top level of law enforcement is corrupt.


8 posted on 07/06/2016 4:16:53 PM PDT by I want the USA back (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Comey made it clear that this is a one time special rule for the Clintons only:

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.

9 posted on 07/06/2016 4:21:52 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
How silly is that. People should understand that the laws that apply to you and me don't influence the Clinton's
10 posted on 07/06/2016 4:26:56 PM PDT by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Didn’t former Clinton aide Sandy Berger pretty much set this precedent? What “sanctions” did he receive for stuffing the classified documents in his britches for totally illicit purposes? Another example of someone who should be making gravel from boulders at Leavenworth...if not feeding the worms!


20 posted on 07/07/2016 6:16:16 AM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (Ready for Teddy, Cruz that is, but now opposing Hillary for Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Thanks a lot Director Comey ...
21 posted on 07/07/2016 8:19:39 AM PDT by shove_it (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen -- Dennis Prager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson