Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

One in a "billion" Shot? Try a Quarter of a Million to One.
Gun Watch ^ | 16 July, 2016 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 07/21/2016 5:21:31 AM PDT by marktwain


An extraordinary shot from a Colorado gunfight is being described as a "one in a billion" shot.  The shot is extraordinary, but the odds are much better than a billion to one.  It is fairly common for people in a gun fight to get hit in the gun arm or gun hand, or for their firearm to be hit.  The gun is usually out front, facing the person who they are firing at and or who is fireing at them.  People tend to equate the gun with the threat, so they focus on the gun hand.  Where the eyes look, the bullets tend to go. From denverpost.com:

In an exchange of gunfire that left him seriously wounded, Marquez hit one suspect in the leg, and another of his .45-caliber bullets made a “one in a billion” shot, according to a letter Orman wrote to Jefferson County Sheriff Jeff Shrader and Aurora Police Chief Nick Metz.

That round traveled up the barrel of the attacker’s gun, colliding with a cartridge in the chamber and rendering the .40-caliber pistol inoperable, the letter said.
Let us do a quick calculation of the odds.  If the barrel is facing the threat, the bullet has to hit the barrel fairly close to the center for it or a significant fragment to travel down the bore.  A reasonable assumption would be that the center of the bullet would have to hit within .1 inches of the center of the bore.

It is reasonable to believe that an average person would be able to keep his shots within a four foot square at pistol fighting distances.  An expert should do much better; If you are in the top 1%, I would expect you to keep them with in one foot square.  But everyone cannot be in the top 1%.  48"x48" gives us a bit less than a quarter of a million .1 x .1 inch squares.

So the odds of the shot are about a quarter million to one. If you are in the top 1%, those odds drop to about 15,000 to one.  But that would presume that you would be aiming for the gun.  An expert usually aims for the heart or the spine.  Those targets are much more likely to stop an assailant with a gun from pulling the trigger.

©2016 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Link to Gun Watch


TOPICS: Local News; Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; defense; freakshot; oneinbillion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
It is not uncommon for people in a gun fight to be hit in the gun arm or hand.
1 posted on 07/21/2016 5:21:32 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Actually, I could care less what the odds are, the shot stopped the threat and THAT is what is the most important.


2 posted on 07/21/2016 5:31:08 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

They should teach police to use this technique and save lives.


3 posted on 07/21/2016 5:39:48 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Interesting to do the math on the odds of dropping one right down the barrel. It doesn’t make it any more or less lucky, in my opinion, than making a hole-in-one on a golf course.


4 posted on 07/21/2016 5:42:00 AM PDT by Quality_Not_Quantity (Democrat Drinking Game - Every time they mention a new social program, chug someone else's beer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

he fired 37 rounds at the target before that one round found its way up the barrel...

odds get better with every shot...

jk about the 37 rounds... as per freerepublic, i did not read the article.

series.

t


5 posted on 07/21/2016 5:45:42 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

To much thinking, just point and shoot. Let the gods sort out the rest.


6 posted on 07/21/2016 5:46:36 AM PDT by Candor7 ( Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The angle also has to be exactly right, that’s the hard part.


7 posted on 07/21/2016 5:46:52 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (VThere's no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

I do not believe the angle is as critical as you might think. If the firearms are pointed pretty much at each other, if one of the bullets hits close to the center of the bore, the bullet is likely to fragment and sent pieces down the barrel of the firearm that is hit.

This is particularly true with the common hollowpoint rounds used by police. They are designed to open up, almost an invitation to send a chunk of lead down the barrel in this situation.


8 posted on 07/21/2016 6:04:39 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

You are way off on your calculations. These 1/250,000 or even 1/billion odds are based on the gun being held still. But not only does the angle of the receiving gun have to be exact right, it has to be right when the bullet reaches the gun. You must also take into account that people flinch when a gun goes off. The person will not just stand and keep pointing their gun at the same angle as before.

The odds must include the reaction of the person on the receiving end. That is incalculable.


9 posted on 07/21/2016 6:10:41 AM PDT by bigred44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It was either RIPLEY’S Believe It or Not or STRANGE As It Seems by Hix that reported a similar incident in which about a 100 years ago a sheriff shot a criminal’s gun blocking the barrel with a bullet.


10 posted on 07/21/2016 6:12:22 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

lol funny


11 posted on 07/21/2016 6:16:00 AM PDT by rolling_stone (our founders are rolling over in their graves, and yelling 2nd amendment when all else fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

They have dug up muskets from civil war battlefields with enemy bullets lodged in the barrel!


12 posted on 07/21/2016 6:23:13 AM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Very interesting, as are all your articles, and very unusual at the same time. Thanks.


13 posted on 07/21/2016 6:28:21 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The Lone Ranger was very good at shooting the gun out of the bad guy’s hand.

Of course, he used silver bullets, so that helps.


14 posted on 07/21/2016 6:33:25 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Hey now baby, get into my big black car, I just want to show you what my politics are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

IIRC, from an article written years ago, it was not uncommon to find revolvers with bullets from the other shooter lodged in the cylnder.

The point of the article was “do not shoot at the gun, shoot for center mass”.


15 posted on 07/21/2016 6:50:33 AM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

actually the odds are the same with every shot


16 posted on 07/21/2016 6:50:39 AM PDT by Mr. K (Trump will win NY state - choke on that HilLIARy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bigred44
The bullet is there before the person hears it OR can flinch. The bullet flies faster than the speed of sound.

Otherwise it would actually be possible to dodge bullets (like in the matrix)

17 posted on 07/21/2016 6:52:55 AM PDT by Mr. K (Trump will win NY state - choke on that HilLIARy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

darn statisticians....

hehehe


18 posted on 07/21/2016 6:57:24 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

If that being true, why are there not dozens of stories about a round going down the barrel of the other gun?

The very few stories I have ever heard deal with battles, like on the Somme or Antietam.

Never a two person gun duel.


19 posted on 07/21/2016 7:02:02 AM PDT by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

It’s somewhat closer to 1 in 7 million.

Figure that (angle of target gun aside) the placement grid is about a tenth of inch, and you can bring your shot to a square about 18 inches on a side — that 32,400 grid spots only one of which is good for true. That’s your odds of hitting the barrel.

To go UP the barrel you then need angular alignment, which is controlled by the target person. Figure that the target gun is being pointed at you pretty closely, so there’s a grid of maybe 15 angles up/down and 15 angles side/side only one of which is good for true. You multiple by 32,400 by 225 (15x15) to get in one in 7,290,000.


20 posted on 07/21/2016 7:02:43 AM PDT by only1percent ( who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson