That’s weird, I wonder why he would be posting a research paper on a U of Texas website when he’s not a student, faculty, or staff there (as evidenced by a search on the school directory at https://directory.utexas.edu/). He works for a company called JWK International, I wonder why he (or somebody) would be putting his name and picture right next to the words “The University of Texas at Austin, Nuclear Engineering Teaching Lab” as if he were on staff there?
EMB, if you think, perhaps, that you are being ignored, well, you would be very close to being spot on.
If you haven’t had a chance to review the IAP seminars conducted by Drs Peter Hagelstein and Mitchell Schwartz at MIT, then please take my recommendation and reserve a couple days to go over the videos of those events. You will at least know what *is* known about this field, and what devices show promise and also demonstrate positive indications of this phenom.
I don’t know the length and breadth of your technical education especially as it relates to physics and nuclear physics and test/measurement methodologies in particular; these are prerequisites short of buying shrink-wrapped, bubble-packed ‘working’ products off a stocked shelf at Wal-Mart in getting a ‘handle’ on whether this is real or quote simple instrumental error unquote or “synchronized mass delusion” by all who participated in this research.
If you are JUST coming on the scene and haven’t been following the efforts of John Spzack or Pamela Mosier-Boss, over the years, I can see where you might be at a disadvantage compared to some of us who have been following the efforts and research in this field.
Pam Mosier-Boss’ CR-39 technique for detecting neutron production is especially intriguing and convincing to me in particular. She has previously published and presented on this subject, too.