Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Martin Armstrong Fears "We Are Being Prepared For World War?"
Zerohedge ^ | 10/13/2016 | Martin Armstrong

Posted on 10/13/2016 12:54:06 PM PDT by Rusty0604

The choice for president has never been so bad. The show 63% of voters said Clinton is overly secretive, 55% said she was corrupt, and 52% said she was “extremely liberal.” This is very interesting since the only presidents since 1900 to be elected with greater than 60% of the popular vote were Lyndon Johnson in 1964 after the Kennedy Assassination, 61.05%, Franklin Roosevelt in 1936 with 60.80%, Richard Nixon in 1972 with 60.67%, and Warren Harding in 1920 with 60.32%. Therefore, Hillary beats everyone with the highest rating of distrust.

The polls are being rigged as they were in Britain for BREXIT. But plan B is clearly being put into play already preparing the public for the accusation that should Trump win, the election will be called a fraud because of Russian hackers.

The , a big Democratic Party mouth piece, ran the story that Russian hackers target the Arizona primary. is carrying the story that Russia will hack the elections. Obama has outright accused Russia of targeting the Democratic National Party (DNC) claiming two Russian hackers were discovered. This is the story being carried even by the , yet the specialist called in was Shawn Henry, the chief security officer at company called in Crowdstrike, who is himself a former executive assistant director of the FBI. It was even bantered about in the between Hillary and Trump. The is jumping in also carrying the story. Reuters is now reporting that there is no question that Russia was behind the hacker at the DNC.

Democrats are now warning foreign governments and hackers that cyber attacks against the U.S. will be treated like any other, even if it leads to war.

DNS hijacking or DNS redirection is a common practice. This amounts to subverting the resolution of Domain Name System (DNS) queries. This can be achieved by malware that overrides a computer’s TCP/IP configuration to point at a rogue DNS server under the control of an attacker. It can even modify the behavior of a trusted DNS server so that it does not comply with internet standards. However, the hardest problem in finding the source of these attacks is really attribution. Each data packet sent over the Internet contains information about its source and its destination. Yet the source field can be changed [spoofed] by an attacker to make it appear as if it is coming from someplace it’s not. This is standard operational procedure. Consequently, I serious doubt that a professional hacker would have left a trace.

I cannot stress strong enough that there is no way they will allow Trump to enter the White House. It appears that should he win, like BREXIT against the odds and the polls, Obama will not leave and the election will be declared a fraud. Obama will most likely step down and hand it to Joe Biden. Our models are showing November as a rather important turning point and this seems unusual insofar as that it would be limited to merely an election. Something else may be in the wind.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Smittie

Trump wins, Obama refuses to leave, the good guys still in the military storm the White House and arrest him.


21 posted on 10/13/2016 1:29:14 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (You can't spell TRIUMPH without TRUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Smittie

I hope you are right. The political hack generals and admirals I worry about because the military are taught to follow orders.


22 posted on 10/13/2016 1:30:17 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Yes.


23 posted on 10/13/2016 1:33:31 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Okay, thanks.


24 posted on 10/13/2016 1:43:18 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

“If Trump wins Obama will start WWIII just to coverup his Mess”

I believe he’s starting it now, probably because of the wikileaks. More still to come on them, but these stories in the past 2 days should show us what the Dems are doing: Russia recalls Russian children in study abroad programs, US took out Houthi base and Iranians on their way to the area, US plans to use the bad guys to attack Russian troops.

Hillary and the Democrats are blaming Russia for wikileaks - without evidence and in a provoking manner. How long do we think Putin will put up with this?


25 posted on 10/13/2016 1:53:52 PM PDT by milford421
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604; All

Are you aware that he predicted an economic collapse last year...So I am not sure about his track record add
to that his interesting past.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/07/governments-worldwide-will-crash-the-first-week-of-october-according-to-2-financial-forecasters.html


26 posted on 10/13/2016 2:15:24 PM PDT by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milford421
My scenario:

1. Obama starts trouble.
2. The Russians respond.
3. Trump goes to meet Putin and says: "A war between Russia and The United States is not in the best interest of either country. I will make a deal for peace."
4. Trump wins the election.
5. Obama and Clinton are charged with war crimes, arrested, and sent to Russia for trial.

27 posted on 10/13/2016 2:19:37 PM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bushwon

A lot of economists have been forecasting economic collapse these last several years but the central banks have prolonged it longer than thought.

I did post this under “conspiracy”.


28 posted on 10/13/2016 2:20:46 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bushwon

You obviously don’t follow Martin Armstrong nor did you read the “update” and “correction” at the end of the article you linked to. Martin’s computer is very, very accurate, so much so the government framed him and locked him up in an attempt to steal his programming code.


29 posted on 10/13/2016 2:27:32 PM PDT by bbernard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bbernard

You obviously don’t follow Martin Armstrong nor did you read the “update” and “correction” at the end of the article you linked to. Martin’s computer is very, very accurate, so much so the government framed him and locked him up in an attempt to steal his programming code.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies


Touchyy touchy...

Not sure when the update was done...but I do follow “economic collapse” news and saw that “Armstrong is not predicting that the crisis will be felt on October 1, 2015. Rather, he’s forecasting that October 1st is a major turning point, but that the governmental financial crisis may not be felt until some months later.” Specifically, Armstrong predicts that a major cycle will turn on October 1, 2015, shifting investors’ trust from the public sector and governments to the private sector. thereby predicting
that huge sums of capital will flow from bonds and the Euro into American stocks resulting in a huge bull market in U.S. stocks.

YOu say he is accurate, and he has made several claims about accurately predicting crashes in 1987, 1998, 1999. However, I think he was wrong on this call...No huge bull market...no crash either...So do we take his word based on things that happened in the 80s/90s or do we look to last year?

So he was framed—you must have some inside track...This is wikipedia:

In 1999, Japanese fraud investigators determined that Armstrong had been collecting money from Japanese investors, improperly “commingling” these funds with funds from other investors, and using the fresh money to cover losses he had incurred while trading.[8] Assisting Armstrong in his scheme was the Republic New York Bank, which produced false account statements to reassure Armstrong’s investors. In 2001, the bank agreed to pay US$606 million as restitution for its part in the scandal.[9]

Armstrong was indicted in 1999, and was ordered by judge Richard Owen to turn over a number of gold bars, computers, and antiquities that had been bought with the fund’s money; the list included bronze helmets and a bust of Julius Caesar.[10] Armstrong produced some of the items, but claimed the others were not in his possession; this led to several contempt of court charges.[11] Armstrong was jailed for seven years for contempt of court, until judge Owen was removed from the case and Armstrong reached a plea agreement with federal prosecutors.[12] Armstrong pleaded guilty to conspiracy and was sentenced to five years in prison.[13] He was released from Federal custody on September 2, 2011.[14]


30 posted on 10/13/2016 2:47:09 PM PDT by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Agreed, but even for Zero Hedge, he is making some rather strong comments—as tho they transcend prediction and are fact. Based on last years prediction, I want more confirmation.


31 posted on 10/13/2016 2:57:44 PM PDT by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bushwon

As with any prediction or conspiracy, there’s no confirmation unless it happens.


32 posted on 10/13/2016 3:42:08 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson