Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whatever Happened to the Articles of Confederation? Part III
Article V Blog ^ | January 16th 2017 | Rodney Dodsworth

Posted on 01/16/2017 1:42:49 AM PST by Jacquerie

As Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army, George Washington knew like no other man of the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation (AC). From the despair at Valley Forge in 1777-78, and a congressional recommendation that he plunder the Pennsylvania countryside for supplies, George Washington and his men felt the full measure of inadequate government.

On March 15th 1783, Washington prevented a mutiny of his army encamped at Newburgh NY that would have changed the course of American history. The Revolutionary War did not end with victory at Yorktown; British troops still held New York, Charleston, Savannah, and western outposts. Ironically, it was rumors of peace that put soldiers in a mutinous mindset, because they rightfully feared a penniless congress might disband the army without paying it off. Thomas Jefferson credited Washington with preventing the revolution from closing as most others, in a subversion of the liberty it was intended to establish.

Washington managed, in part, to cool tempers by promising to exhort congress and the states to form a stronger union. In his June 1783 circular letter to the states, he rhetorically asked if the revolution was a blessing or a curse. To remain a blessing, he urged “an indissoluble Union of the States under one Federal Head.” The war was the thin glue that held the states together. Without it, why remain in confederation, especially when congress was powerless to enforce its resolutions?

(Excerpt) Read more at articlevblog.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: articlev; confederation; constitution; conventionofstates; cos

1 posted on 01/16/2017 1:42:49 AM PST by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

My wife and I have been watching on DVD the George Washington miniseries, and we just finished watching the John Adams miniseries. The more I learn of George Washington, (and he was my hero when I first read a biography of him when I was in third grade) the more I agree with Flexner’s subtitle of “the Indispensable Man.”

The more I learn of history, the more I see how rare he was, and how so often revolutions and civil wars end so badly. History has more Robepierres, Napoleons, and Stalins than George Washingtons.

There were so many occasions when Washington singlehandedly prevented us from going the way of the Latin American banana republics.

(I know this is a bit off topic, but I was moved to comment.)


2 posted on 01/16/2017 5:17:31 AM PST by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

Well said. My favorite comparison is to the Roman, Cincinnatus. Like GW, he was a farmer. At the beginning of a war during the early republic, he was given dictatorial power for six months. After defeating Rome’s enemy, he simply returned to his farm.

Yes, GW was THE Indispensable Man.


3 posted on 01/16/2017 6:17:00 AM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson