“All his family includes children and slaves.”
You repeatedly miss the point. I am not questioning infant baptism in itself. I am question the presuppositions of the Lutheran understanding of faith and grace.
>>You repeatedly miss the point. I am not questioning infant baptism in itself. I am question the presuppositions of the Lutheran understanding of faith and grace.
Had you made a single point, your claim could have theoretical plausibility. You can question whatever you want. You make no effort at defining how you understand terms like faith and grace and where you get your understanding of those terms from. You just assume your presuppositions and private definitions are authoritative. Hence, you are impervious to dialog.
Besides, you haven’t the foggiest notion of Lutheran presuppositions about what God reveals in Scripture and how reason aides in understanding of Scripture when used properly: specifically, reason used ministerially and not magisterially.