Here's a review of the Henry Arms .45-70 Lever Action Rifle, and it didn’t disappoint. This big game rifle was born to hunt. I gave the Henry Arms .45-70 Lever Action Rifle thorough testing, and here is what I found. Posted on 10/04/2017 5:35:09 AM PDT by w1n1
Here's a review of the Henry Arms .45-70 Lever Action Rifle, and it didn’t disappoint. This big game rifle was born to hunt. I gave the Henry Arms .45-70 Lever Action Rifle thorough testing, and here is what I found.
The great folks at Henry Repeating Arms sent me over a blued-steel Model H010 Lever Action Rifle in the big-game-dropping .45-70 caliber. I had Henry Arms deliver it to my good friend Steve over at Silverado Arms Gunshop. Steve and the great folks over at the shop always make it a pleasant visit with many temptations to my wallet. Now let’s see what this fine rifle is all about. Here are the details directly from Henry’s website: “It has an 18.43″ barrel, weighs only 7.08 pounds, and features a blued steel round barrel and receiver.”
First off, like all of Henry’s product line, this lever-action rifle is a beauty made right here in the United States. The American Walnut stock is checkered for sure grip and it’s ready for a scope mount. Beauty and drama-free? Indeed, it truly is.
Its 4+1 capacity gives you five hard-hitting .45-70 cartridges at a time. For deer, you’ll likely only need one with a steady hand, but in bear country, five rounds is good for me against a possible attack.
The tubular magazine on this rifle represents a hotly-contested debate among hunters and target shooters . While many people like having the ability the load their lever-action from the side, the tubular magazine allows for a quick removal of all cartridges inside.
There’s no need to keep cycling the action to remove all loaded cartridges. You can just.. Read the rest of the Henry Arms .45-70 Lever Action Rifle review here.
Do any of your writers speak English?
Me wantee.
Highly sought when it was introduced and remains so today.
Me wantee too. I've been drooling to get a 45-70. I have a Mossberg Model 479 30-30 lever action that I love...but I'd love to get a Henry lever action some day.
I have a Marlin 1895 45-70. I don’t hunt anymore but I just love to shoot it.
I had a Marlin 1895 in .45-70 back in the ‘70s. I could handload up to within about 18% of .458 Win Mag ballistics.
Talk about a kickin’ SOB but it sure hit with authority.
It was good old gun.
I’ve got a Henry 44 mag w/brass receiver. They are fun to shoot, just for plinking. (I reload.) I’ve owned Marlin and Winchester lever actions. Some shooters like the traditional loading gate on the side, but I got tired of “lever action thumb.” Those side loading gates can be painful, especially in cold weather.
I wonder if the author knew Capt Whiley USMC (ret)?
It looks like a Marlin to me.
I’ve got a Henry .22 Cal Yellow Boy reproduction and love it.
When I was a kid, I always loved lever action. I grew up and ended up with many firearms, as I’m an enthusiast. My first Winchester fed all the bullets at once into the receiver from the tube each time you dropped the lever. Each shot had to be loaded one at a time to fire it.
The second, a Marlin in .444 would not lift the next round into place. You could pull up on the lever, but it was locked. You had to unjam each shot with your finger.
The third, another Winchester, would fail to pull rounds out of the tube when the lever was dropped, about 60% of the time.
The final straw was an .44 Magnum Henry that never once successfully closed on a round, chanbering it. You had to guide each one into the chamber with your finger.
I don’t buy lever action anymore. I have never owned one that worked correctly, out of 4. 3 were new, the Henry was used, and all were garbage.
I own a Big Boy in .45 Long Colt so I can use the same rounds with the SA Army. Nice and convenient.
4+1 is excessive, should be 1+1. If you need more than two rounds to shoot a deer, you shouldn’t be hunting. And it boggles the mind that some lever guns can hold fourteen or more bullets. Shot after shot each time the thingy that goes down is worked, fourteen times. Nobody needs the devastating firepower of this hillbilly assault rifle.
/sarc
You’ve had some bad luck with lever guns, so I can understand your attitude about them. I two that I have work just fine.
The Savage 99C in .308 is a safe queen, with sentimental ties to my deceased father-in-law. He got it bequeathed when his best friend and fellow WA State Trooper, Frank Noble, was murdered on duty in 1972.
My Winchester 94 Trapper AE in .357 Magnum feeds both .357 and .38 in all nose profiles. The only thing is the Model 94 action, originally designed for rifle-length rounds, is not as smooth as the Model 92. Short stroking can happen if you don’t work the lever like you mean it. I tell my kids it’s one thing they can work like they want to break it.
I’ve seen several of these problems, a simple fix for a gunsmith. Rifles should not have left the factory like that.
Winchester cheapened their 1894 lever action rifles in 1964, giving them a bad reputation.
The first, there is a point of metal that is supposed to prevent a second cartridge from feeding. A few minutes with a gas welder will fix it.
Second was the hole the frame for the tube magazine was in was too small. Cases caught on the rim as they fed into the carrier. A few minutes with a round file fixed it.
Next problem was a Uberti Winchester 66. Someone had fired hot .38 cartridges in it causing the frame to stretch a few thousands of an inch. No fix for it.
Third was a Uberti 1873 Winchester in which the loading gate would not go in far enough to load a cartridge. Even the gunsmith gave up on it. I finally took it apart and found a few strokes on a grinder fixed it.
For the old reproductions of Winchesters, “Henry”, 1866, 1873, 1876, bullet length is very important. Too short and the cartridge will be jammed by the next cartridge in line. Too long and the cartridge will stick into the tube just enough the carrier will not lift it.
I always keep a small flat screwdriver handy to stick in the ejection port to either push the second cartridge back into the tube, or to try and press an overlong bullet back into the case enough to allow it to fit the carrier.
Another thing I noticed, in an original 1873 Winchester 38-40, they are very sloppy chambered causing the cases to blow forward and split at the bottleneck. I later figured this was done on purpose to prevent reloading the empty cases.
Another thing, on the reproduction Winchesters, maybe others, a semi-wadcutter bullet will often catch on the chamber mouth requiring you to work with it to get it in the chamber. Round nose bullets work better.
It was just a mess. We only had one gunsmith in the area who even I was more skilled than and we couldn’t get satisfactory results. I much prefer my M1A and Mak90. Autos and bolt guns lime my No. 4 Mk. 1 in .303 seldom fail me
Bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.