[ProtectOurFreedom]

In case you’re wondering:

1. The inability to make the campaign about anything but herself. The phrase that really stuck, “I’m with Her,” was about Clinton, not about voters. [Why not? “Me, me, me, me” worked for O’Bastard]

2. Clinton failed was because of mistakes prior to the campaign that haunted her: the private email server she used for official government business and her decision to take hefty speaking fees from large banks and then never release those speeches. [”Mistakes” - for crying out loud! Big time felony law-breaking and corruption hauling down $300,000 for a “speech.” That was nothing but thinly disguised campaign contributions far exceeding the legal limit.]

3. Overemphasis on data over gut instinct and traditional political strategies, like knocking on doors. Instead of trying to persuade undecided voters, like Bill Clinton wanted, the polling data told the campaign to focus on rallying the base in Democratic strongholds. [She is SO UNLIKEABLE that most people wouldn’t open their doors for her.]

[Newbomb Turk]

These three things don't even scratch the surface as to why she lost.

She's a horrible self centered person and though she should be crowned Queen.

Why aren't I 50 points ahead you might ask ?

Remember that day ? She still thinks she will be eventually coordinated thats why she is still hanging in there.

Even her husband can't stand her.

[AndyJackson]

Lying, stealing, and egomania

[hinckley buzzard]

The book really spells out these factors in detail, with emphasis on number 3. The Robbie Mook person was totally incompetent and a smug know it all who didn’t know anything about the real world. He trusted his autistic system of data analysis more than the instincts of the perceptive Bill Clinton, and Hillary inexplicably trusted this juvenile geek. Too clever by half, as usual.

[RooRoobird20]

I loved the fact that the “data” showed the campaign officials that the more voters saw of Hillary, the less they liked her. Which helps explain why she campaigned at the pace of a bloated disabled sow.

[SunkenCiv]

thanks ProtectOurFreedom for summarizing those authors’ three reasons she lost. I’d add or point out, that she lost despite the kid-glove treatment given her by 99 percent of members of the so-called profession of journalism (urinalism), despite the fact that she had her campaign staff herd them like animals, forbid questions, and force them into prior restraint. The constant stream of boosterism by the Partisan Media Shills was sickening, revolting, and part of a systematic and decades-long partisan attack on the First Amendment.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3596297/posts?page=5#5