Posted on 10/30/2017 9:30:27 AM PDT by davikkm
Have to laugh how all the news blurbs on this refer to it as from the Russian Probe...
Short answer? NOTHING
How much $$ to indict manafort on charges Mueller and the FBI were aware of when he was FBI director? Could have had this indictment for free years ago.
Directly? Nothing. But they may offer Manafort a deal in exchange for information on the campaign.
If any of the indictment is based on wiretap data then this may get thrown out. The wiretap was based on the Fusion GPS’ Trump Dossier which was paid for by the DNC and known to be largely speculative and sensational.
“What does this have to do with Trump?”
It has nothing to do.
It is all about threatening this guy and use this as a way to come up with fake BS on Trump or else...you fry.
When will Podesta be indicted?
This has nothing to do with collusion. But it does have something to do with Russia, through the Ukraine. And Mueller can investigate anything that includes the word “Russia”.
How did he know to go after Manafort for money laundering and not registering as a foreign lobbyist. And whose money did he launder?
Isn't that Interesting?
Mueller was FBI director when all of these *gasp* "money laundering" was going down. But he didn't do anything about it then. Why not?
Maybe he could plead "I don't remember, it was so long ago" when the new "Spacial Counsel to Investigate the Special Counsel" is appointed.
They already have flipped GP. He has something Mueller wanted
But someone had to be caught or the whole investigation would be seen as futile, fraudulent, a politically motivated witch hunt.
(insert picture of Scooter Libby with meme "#ME TOO)
After this laughable witch hunt, Trump needs to focus ALL guns on Mueller, Clinton, Podesta, and the Swamp. Put them in the “Nooses” that Hillary Clinton interestingly fears so much...
Whatever ties Manafort has that led to this list of charges, is much more likely to be part of his association with the John Podesta rat’s nest. And it was not Russia, but the Ukraine.
It may actually be nothing but it’s something that gives validity to the wild stories the MSM have been spinning.
Trump better go on the offense and fast.
“Directly? Nothing. But they may offer Manafort a deal in exchange for information on the campaign.”
Exactly. Mueller is “squeezing” Manafort. “Mr. Manafort, we’d hate to see you locked away for life for these serious crimes. You would become bankrupt fighting the charges and still go to prison, rarely seeing your family. However, give us some information relating to Trump and Russians and this all could turn into a minor slap on the wrist.”
It has everything to do with slapping down Trump and making great headlines.
All about “word association” IMHO.
Doesn’t have to have any validity etcetera as the MSM Presstitutes know if they say DJT’s name and talking points that include TREE, SQUIRREL, FISH, CLEAN AIR, SAVE THE GAY WHALES, CARBON CREDITS, WILDERNESS ....... then right or wrong he becomes the greatest environmentalist evah ......
A Joesph Goebbles standard of propaganda for presstitutes and polidiots to validate undisclosed sources versions of “facts” .
It’s all about eye wash!
This gives the media plenty of opportunity to talk about Manafort being indicted for fronting for the Ukranians while failing to mention that these actions occurred long before he was associated with the Trump campaign.
Instead, the talking points will be that the indictment came out of the Mueller probe of a Russian connection to the Trump campaign.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.