why is it sourcery’s job to refute an allegation by be-baw by listing corroborative evidence? It is be-baw’s job to provide at least a few instances of why True Pundit is un-trust-worthy site.
The prosecutor/accuser always must provide incriminating evidence, not the defendant.
How about his bogus claim to being a Polk award recipient? He has since revised it down to being merely a Polk award nominee, but even that’s bogus.