Posted on 09/20/2023 7:42:48 PM PDT by davikkm
First, Rep. Victoria Spartz’s interaction with Attorney General Merrick Garland is a must-watch for every American citizen. She highlights concerns about the Department of Justice (DOJ) and its alleged corruption.
Spartz’s assessment is strong and she raises valid points about the state of the DOJ. She doesn’t mince words when she accuses Merrick Garland of being the most corrupt Attorney General in U.S. history. She also labels him as a despicable liar who, in her view, has eroded the rule of law in our country. This sharp criticism reflects the growing unease regarding Garland’s leadership within the DOJ.
On another front, Rep. Thomas Massie joins the conversation by questioning Attorney General Garland about the sudden DOJ scrutiny of companies like SpaceX and Tesla. This abrupt shift in focus raises eyebrows.
One intriguing theory emerges from Massie’s inquiry: Could this targeting of Elon Musk’s companies be a response to Musk’s deviation from the approved narrative? It’s worth noting that Elon Musk initially supported President Biden, but when he began to voice dissenting views, the DOJ seemed to take an interest. This raises the question of whether Musk’s experience serves as a warning to others who might consider straying from the established narrative.
These interactions shed light on the complex dynamics surrounding the Department of Justice’s actions and motivations, which have ignited concerns and speculation among both lawmakers and the public.
He undid that by voting to confirm him as AG.
See post 21. Aforementioned “good thing” was rapidly undone.
He is Laurenti Beria!
Eric Holder laid the foundation for weaponized DOJ.
I am always wondering why Steve Bannon does not point to Holder as settled law and the reason when he B(annon) is scheduled to do time for ignoring a house subpoena.
I keep hearing that, but disagree. He is a hell of a lot more dangerous and destructive as US AG than he would be just one vote amongst nine. It's not like he could get much farther left than Sotomayor, Kagan or Brown-Jackson. The only difference is that being AG isn't (hopefully, anyway) a lifetime appointment.
Gorsuch wouldn’t be on the SCOTUS today. And the Democrats would have four Leftist Justices.
Holder and Obama turned DOJ into the woke KGB, using all the powers Bush & Co gave them.
Garland is just trying to put his own mark on it.
Yes.
Since “corrupt” and “Democrat” are synonymous, Barr wins.
Lawfare is the current favorite weapon of the left.
“The Kennedy brothers are the model for Democrats.”
They ended up dead. The swamp lives and feeds. Some model. Try another.
I found her more effective indictment, that seemed to have gone mostly unremarked by the media, to be when she told Attorney General Garland that America is afraid of him.
The Attorney General of the United States makes Americans afraid of their own government.
Her passion was made all the more evocative by her personal biography and because it was delivered in her accent.
Sickle and Ebert give the answer of ten fingers up.
True
At least President Trump had his daughter as an advisor and not in a Senate-confirmed Cabinet position.
-PJ
To the question... Yes!
He is almost 71. I doubt he would be on the replacement list.
That’s for sure...can you imagine if he hadn’t?
Shudder to think about it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.