Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do Freepers "abandoning" bush serve a Purpose?

Posted on 01/29/2004 1:47:51 PM PST by wadeintothem

Conservatives Pissed at Bush.. may in fact serve a real purpose.. IMO


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
Comment #61 Removed by Moderator

To: tessalu; hchutch
SKYBIRD SKYBIRD DO NOT ANSWER

SKYBIRD SKYBIRD DO NOT ANSWER

EMERGENCY ACTION MESSAGE FOLLOWS

COMMAND WORD: COTTONMOUTH
DESIGNATOR: JERICHO
DAY WORD: TRINITY

ZOT PER SIOP OPTION TWO ONE ZEBRA "GRAND TOUR"

AUTHENTICATOR: VIKING KITTENS ARE OUR OVERLORDS

EMERGENCY ACTION MESSAGE ENDS

BT



NNNN
62 posted on 01/29/2004 2:19:59 PM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
A little of President Kerry will really straighten up Bush!

Then when this country is taken to its knees by Dems, we can sit back in our moral vanity and say it is all Bush's fault.
63 posted on 01/29/2004 2:21:08 PM PST by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: wadeintothem
No republican supporter would never spell Bush "bush".
64 posted on 01/29/2004 2:21:51 PM PST by Orange1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wadeintothem
Do Freepers "abandoning" bush serve a Purpose?

I don't think it makes any difference. Bush is going to continue to promote open borders, citizenship for illegals, and destroying the social security and health care for Americans by enrolling the entire country of Mexico for benefits. And if he doesn't get elected the Democrats will do all of the above and more.

It doesn't matter who is elected in 2004, Vincente Fox will be our president.

65 posted on 01/29/2004 2:22:15 PM PST by swampfox98 (Beyond 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluntpoint
Like Kerry, tessalu demands universal health care.
66 posted on 01/29/2004 2:22:27 PM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: wadeintothem
Can anyone here really see Lurch in office? Can anyone see John Kerry conducting the war on terror with the same amount of intensity? And can anyone here vote for Kerry, Howard Dean, John Edwards, Al Sharpton, or Joe Lieberman and expect those Tax Cuts to stay permanent?

Chris
67 posted on 01/29/2004 2:22:29 PM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
In a way, GW is an example of a classical conservative, in that he has no problem using government power, big government power at that, to implement "conservative" principles. However, he has really gone even beyond that, what with medical entitlements, and this new NEA welfare for artists promise. That stuff is actually leftist, IMO.

I'm starting to wonder who he really is.
68 posted on 01/29/2004 2:23:23 PM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
Bush chose to give tax refunds to the rich and created more deficits.. LOL.. Obviously not a fan of Reagonomics. ALL tax cuts are good. Get with the program.. Deaniac arguments are not needed at FreeRepublic. Whats next? a big yeeeeeeeeeeoooowwwww?
69 posted on 01/29/2004 2:23:24 PM PST by wadeintothem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: William Creel
Personally I'm getting to the point where I hope the Democrats win so I can tell the fair weather "conservatives" on here to just STFU when they start to whine about President Democrat.

It will be lovely to see the Abort-O-matics, gun gestapo, smoking nazis, Christian hunters, and special interest, affirmative action groups. Take charge of the country all due in large part of the help of wonderfully pure conservatives.


I feel like giving out a Howard Dean YYYYYYYYYRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
70 posted on 01/29/2004 2:23:27 PM PST by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Either Kerry or Bush will appoint the Judges that will be with us for the next generation.

Kerry already said that he will use a litmus test for his judicial appointments, only pro-choice liberals.

I'm really concerned about US Supreme Court. When the majority wrote her opinion on Lawrence v Texas, I was alarmed at their use of foreign law to justify their decision. I was not so much surprised at their decision, but at their rationale for arriving at their conclusions.

If we don't get another set of Thomas and Scalia in the US Supreme Court, I'm afraid our constitution will begin to take second place to some UN Charter or European Union constitution.

71 posted on 01/29/2004 2:23:31 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: E=MC<sup>2</sup>
"The friend of my enemy is my is my neighbor making a protest vote to send a message."
72 posted on 01/29/2004 2:24:12 PM PST by Bluntpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

Comment #73 Removed by Moderator

Comment #74 Removed by Moderator

To: Bluntpoint
I will be all Bush's fault when the new Supreme Court allow third trimester abortions under a President that's a Democrat.

It's sooooo obvious!

I can't wait for the enviromentalist to start their brainwashing stage 2.
75 posted on 01/29/2004 2:26:25 PM PST by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
I am stunned a Free Republic thinking human would not vote.

I want to know what Bush has done to make this happen.

Please read my post again. I said that after November 2004, I will never again vote for another Bush. I never said I would never vote again.

As for the reasons, well I'm sure you're aware of them if you've been following these threads. But in a nutshell, the Farm Bill, the Energy Bill, the immigration proposal, the out-of-control spending have put me off Bushes for good. Yes, he's done a lot of good, particularly regarding the WOT. But I will never again support a Republican who spends like a Democrat. The country can't afford it.

76 posted on 01/29/2004 2:27:12 PM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998
No republican supporter would never spell Bush "bush".

gimee a break ... I type as a chat.. its not expository writing. here: http://pub41.ezboard.com/fspring1942frm88 I have almost 4000 posts bashing liberals and dems. So give me a break. I'm a life long Rep and NRA member. Wheres your resume?
77 posted on 01/29/2004 2:27:44 PM PST by wadeintothem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: conserv13
Reading that gives me the creeping willies!

I can't imagine why...


78 posted on 01/29/2004 2:29:13 PM PST by Prime Choice (I'm pro-choice. I just think the "choice" should be made *before* having sex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wadeintothem
I think there are 3 ways where we can get the WH attention to these issues.

1) Polls - Each time I get a request for a donation, they send along an RNC "Poll". I'd imagine others get these as well. Fill them out and circle those areas of contention. Update the Comments field with what you're angry about and send it back, which brings me to #2...

2) Donations: Stop. Sorry, but the fact is all organizations look at money, and if they see donations drop off significantly, they'll want to know why. Suggest they make up that money thru the Illegals who are getting that big sloppy kiss on their butts for breaking the law.

3) Letters/Phone Calls/EMails - Let them hear you. be organized. Be polite. Be direct. Let them know exactly why you are angry. Don't be afraid to let them know you'd consider other Candidates.

79 posted on 01/29/2004 2:30:05 PM PST by theDentist (Boston: So much Liberty, you can buy a Politician already owned by someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
You're not voting for Bush because he's not liberal enough?
80 posted on 01/29/2004 2:30:28 PM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson