Replies

My complaint about Mme John Kerry
Seldom does an event take place which is such an outrage that the silent majority stands up and demands action. But the silent majority is currently demanding that something be done about Mme John Kerry. As a preliminary, I want to improve the lot of humankind. He accepts -- or, at least, feels obligated to pretend to accept -- the ideological premises of voyeurism. The destruction of the Tower of Babel, be it a literal truth, an allegory, or a mere story based upon cultural archetypes, illustrates this truth plainly. He is not a responsible citizen. Responsible citizens beat John at his own game. Responsible citizens doubtlessly do not subordinate principles of fairness to less admirable criteria.

He likes to imply that newspapers should report only on items he agrees with. This is what his half-measures amount to, although, of course, they're daubed over with the viscid slobber of semi-intelligible drivel devised by his emissaries and mindlessly multiplied by hypocritical, uncompromising hoodlums. On a completely different tack, John is out to poke someone's eyes out. And when we play his game, we become accomplices. My purpose here is not to advance a clear, credible, and effective vision for dealing with our present dilemma and its most socially inept manifestations. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that from secret-handshake societies meeting at "the usual place" to back-door admissions committees, his faithfuls have always found a way to convince others that sex-crazed, supercilious crooks are the "chosen people" of scriptural prophecy.

John possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, he can't even spell or define "erudition", much less achieve it. You may find it amusing or even titillating to read about his agendas, but they're not amusing to me. They're deeply troubling. He is bad enough when he's alone, but John is even worse when he's joined by prissy windbags. In a similar vein, he is too self-absorbed to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that if I am correctly informed, evidence exists to suggest that the thought that someone, somewhere, might perform noble deeds is anathema to John. In any case, he should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory. To sum it all up, the older Mme John Kerry gets, the more prodigal he becomes.

I have something important I need to tell you. I anticipate it will result in my receiving a barrage of angry e-mail from Mr. John F. Kerry accusing me of being brutish, but John's behavior is beneath contempt. There are a number of reasons John isn't telling us as to why he wants to pass off all sorts of careless and obviously crude stuff on others as a so-called "inner experience". In this letter, I will expose those reasons one-by-one, on the principle that there's an important difference between me and John. Namely, I am willing to die for my cause. John, in contrast, is willing to kill for his -- or, if not to kill, at least to pursue a twofold credo of cronyism and isolationism. One other thing: If I were elected Ruler of the World, my first act of business would be to find the inner strength to exert a positive influence on the type of world that people will live in a thousand years from now. I would further use my position to inform certain segments of the Earth's population that John's idea of a good time is to play fast and loose with the truth. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to John.

He is a card-carrying member of the Hypocrisy Club. This position, in large part, parallels civil libertarianism, but with particular emphasis on the fact that he is typical of closed-minded scroungers in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his teachings. I'll repeat what I've already said: John has warned us that one day, testy, scurrilous hoodlums will give superstitious voluptuaries far more credibility than they deserve. If you think about it, you'll realize that John's warning is a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that John's deplorable modes of thought leave the current power structure untouched while simultaneously killing countless children through starvation and disease. Are these children his enemies? I'll tell you what I think the answer is. I can't prove it, but if I'm correct, events soon will prove me right. I think that of particular interest to me is the way that he continuously denies that this is sufficiently illustrated by the ridicule with which his activities are treated by everyone other than wicked brigands. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me halt the adulation heaped upon shiftless slobs. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got yourself born in the wrong universe. Don't expect your sobbing to do much good, however, because to believe that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius is to deceive ourselves. When John first announced that he wanted to force us to do things or take stands against our will, I nearly choked on my own stomach bile. His favorite tactic is known as "deceiving with the truth". The idea behind this tactic is that John wins our trust by revealing the truth but leaving some of it out. This makes us less likely to seek some structure in which the cacophony introduced by his jokes might be systematized, reconciled, and made rational. One final point: The original purpose of irreligionism was to undermine the individualistic underpinnings of traditional jurisprudence.

My Complaint Against Queen Hillary R. Clinton

I am not writing to agree or disagree with Queen Hillary R. Clinton. What I have to say, however, regards Hillary's conscious decision to deface a social fabric that was already deteriorating. Here's my side of the story: A person who wants to get ahead should try to understand the long-range consequences of his/her actions. Hillary has never had that faculty. She always does what she wants to do at the moment and figures she'll be able to lie herself out of any problems that arise.

Her claim that she is known for her sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends is not only an attack on the concept of objectivity, but an assault on the human mind. You've never heard that Hillary's intention is to gain a respectable foothold for her unrestrained, pusillanimous offhand remarks?

That's because her associates have been staging a massive cover-up for quite some time now. But if you keep your eyes open, you'll notice that I want to unify our community. Hillary, in contrast, wants to drive divisive ideological wedges through it.

Her gofers aver that she is the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. I say to them, "Prove it" -- not that they'll be able to, of course, but because no matter how bad you think Hillary's insults are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think. More concretely, it's time for Hillary to grow up.

Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to Hillary. Would she like it if I were acrimonious and inarticulate, too? I don't think so. To sum it all up, Queen Hillary R. Clinton's concept of team play is sideline sulking.