Replies

Suggest you read more of the vanity posts and what has been said following the debate including by the media before you go off the deepend!

2 posted on 09/30/2004 10:42:36 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Oklahoma is Reagan Country and now Bush Country -- Vote for Dr. Tom)

With due respect, I also get to say what I saw. Bush was a weak debater and I just hope he is more forceful next time around.

16 posted on 09/30/2004 10:49:18 PM PDT by A Navy Vet (www.opgratitude.com)

Head handed to him? I don't think so.

There are a 100 things I wish he would have said, most importantly that the so called major allies that Kerry harps on -- France, Russians (and to a lesser degree the Germans) were in fact Saddam's allies not the US's in this whole affair. They are the reason the US went to war....they betrayed the US in UN process and emboldened Saddam.

However, Bush as President could not say those, and MANY more, things. As a challenger he could have, but he still has to run our foreign policy why running for reelection.

He was hamstrung by BEING PRESIDENT. This was start of round one and the effects from this debate will change day to day until the round two, the next debate. In the mean time, there are clips of Kerry (such as saying we have to pass the global test to strike at terrorists) that will get huge play between now and the next debate...so we shall see.

22 posted on 09/30/2004 10:54:02 PM PDT by Jackson Brown

more "woe is bush" vanity posts.

but the fact that the adminmod considers this "breaking news" when it is just another woe is us, op ed?

I just don't get it.

26 posted on 09/30/2004 10:54:28 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794