Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barry Bonds: Before & After Photos

Posted on 12/04/2004 8:24:41 AM PST by TRY ONE

Anyone have Before/After Photos of Barry Bonds ---

One photo ~ 20 years ago when Barry was ~ 180 lbs with a hat size of ~ 7 1/2;

And a recent photo showing him ~ 260 lbs with a hat size of ~ 9 3/4;


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: balco; barrybonds; bonds; doping; steroids
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: Muzzle_em

"His kidneys shut down and he had a transplant."

Yeah, kind of like the NBA's Alonzo Mourning. Oh, and FloJo (Florence Griffith Joyner) just happened to die in her early thirties, I guess from natural causes. Right. Walter Payton too.


21 posted on 12/04/2004 8:52:49 AM PST by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Freepdonia
Actually, there's no doubt now that Bonds used steroids. He admited as much. However, he also claims he "didn't know" what he was being given by the Balco Boys were 'roids. He apparently wants us to believe he's so stone stupid that he thought the massive mucle mass gain he received was from "nutritional supplements".

My opinion (even though you didn't ask)? He knew, he made a conscious decision, he's a pr!ck, and he should be sent packing now, before there's any "asterisk" controversy when he passes Ruth and Aaron.

22 posted on 12/04/2004 8:55:40 AM PST by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: meyer
Actually, the bodybuilders today are using doses that weren't even considered in the '60's and '70's. Look at the size of some of the top competitors today - they put Arnold's size to shame.

From what I have read about it, they don't use nearly the same level of dosages that they used earlier. IOW, it was overkill back then. The reports I have read are from the bodybuilders themselves such as Tom Platz and Dave Draper.
23 posted on 12/04/2004 8:57:01 AM PST by Freepdonia (Victory is Ours! (I told you so :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE

Yeh, but his attorney was on tv and said he was rubbing the cream on his body in front of G_d and everybody and he didn't know the cream had steriods, so he isn't responsible.

Case closed.


[lol. Gotta love those paid mouthpieces.]


24 posted on 12/04/2004 8:57:34 AM PST by TomGuy (America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor29
Right. Walter Payton too.

Payton? Was he any bigger at the end of his career than he was at the start? He always looked the same to me. Not that I would be shocked if he had, mind you.
25 posted on 12/04/2004 9:00:20 AM PST by Freepdonia (Victory is Ours! (I told you so :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: babygene
Why is it anyone's business what substances an athlete takes?

For the same reason they won't allow corked bats, or vaseline on the ball when pitched, or stick-em on receivers in football, etc., etc. Those are performance enhancers which give an athlete an artificial advantage. It's sports... it's supposed to be about clean, fair competition. Yeah, it's a money making business, but it relies on the fans believing the playing field is level.

Hell, why not allow batters to come to the plate packing guns, and if they get a pitch they don't like, they can shoot the pitchers, then round the bases? Why not allow them to carry the bat all the way around the bases with them? It would certainly make breaking up a double play a lot easier. Again, the idea is to make the playing field as level as possible. Steroid use throws that all out of whack.

26 posted on 12/04/2004 9:01:40 AM PST by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jokelahoma
Actually, there's no doubt now that Bonds used steroids. He admited as much. However, he also claims he "didn't know" what he was being given by the Balco Boys were 'roids. He apparently wants us to believe he's so stone stupid that he thought the massive mucle mass gain he received was from "nutritional supplements".

Yeah, his defense smells really bad, doesn't it? :-)
27 posted on 12/04/2004 9:02:30 AM PST by Freepdonia (Victory is Ours! (I told you so :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: babygene
Why is it anyone's business what substances an athlete takes?

Medical reasons aside (and there's lots of debate on that issue), the issue relates to maintaining a level playing field among the participants in the sport. Bobby Bonds might be a better home runner than Hank Aaron or Babe Ruth, but if his performance was enhanced in a manner not available to the others, would his capabilities really be superior? The rules are there for several reasons, and that's one of them.

28 posted on 12/04/2004 9:03:31 AM PST by meyer (Our greatest opponent is a candidate called Complacency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TRY ONE
I don't know what this proves. Look at his how his father aged here.
29 posted on 12/04/2004 9:03:40 AM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freepdonia
I'm shocked that any of them are still alive now.

Remember Lyle Alzado, he played NFL football for the Broncos and later the Raiders? He was picked up by the Broncos out of Yankton College in SD for practically nothing by the Broncos and made the team. He became a steroid junkie in an effort to maintain a competitive edge. As his football career advanced so did his strange behavior, eventually he left football and, not long after, died of a malignant brain tumor.

30 posted on 12/04/2004 9:04:40 AM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Freepdonia
Check out the picture series at ESPN's site. It shows photos of Bonds every year from 1988 to 2004, with stats (HR's, RBI's, and AVG) for each season.

Yes, over time Bonds does get bigger and clearly heavier - but with age, most people do. But the increase in his head size and muscle mass are undeniable, and to me, a pretty good indication that he used steroids.

But the other thing about Bonds is that he has, for all of those seasons, put up 30-50 HR's almost every year. You can't explain that through steroid use alone - the guy is a great hitter with a good eye and a beautiful swing. However, that being said, the incredible numbers he's put up over the period from 2000-2004, definitely stretches plausibility unless you accept that he has been using steroids, particularly given his advancing age. Most baseball players see their performance peak from age 28-32 (or thereabouts). For Bonds to put up the most monsterous numbers of his career from age 37-42 is, to say the least, extremely suspicious.

31 posted on 12/04/2004 9:04:47 AM PST by Sicon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Huck

There's a big change from 1999 thru 2001.


32 posted on 12/04/2004 9:04:58 AM PST by TankerKC (R.I.P. Spc Trevor A. Win'E American Hero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Freepdonia

Virtually EVERY NFL guy is on the stuff. The biggest joke in this whole thing is the NFL coming out with their 'holier than thou' proclamations about their steroid testing. Every year they pick one insignificant player to be the sacrificial lamb for p.r. purposes and they suspend this guy to show how tough they are on steroid enforcement. The whole league collapses and they start over if steroids are ever dissallowed in the NFL. Baseball has a problem with 'roids, no doubt about it. But the NFL is a complete joke and completely phony on this subject.


33 posted on 12/04/2004 9:04:59 AM PST by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Freepdonia
From what I have read about it, they don't use nearly the same level of dosages that they used earlier. IOW, it was overkill back then. The reports I have read are from the bodybuilders themselves such as Tom Platz and Dave Draper.

A lot of what they're saying is designed to enhance the image of bodybuilding. But I don't think we're breeding people that much larger today than we were 30 years ago.

I've heard other bodybuilders report differently, but not in more public avenues.

34 posted on 12/04/2004 9:07:02 AM PST by meyer (Our greatest opponent is a candidate called Complacency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

Quite right Gary, if fat deposits were signs of steroid use, I'd be typing this from a maximum security steroid detox unit. LOL


35 posted on 12/04/2004 9:07:07 AM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Freepdonia

Also, Marion Jones didn't put on incredible amounts of mass, just some. But Payton and others were really 'cut' and that muscle definition doesn't just come naturally.


36 posted on 12/04/2004 9:10:26 AM PST by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ft50
"Would really like to see pics--saw something like this before--like night and day"

- Yeah, me too - some guy named Ruth who started out slim as a rake and ended up looking like a sack of turds tied in the middle. His home runs kept going up with his girth so I figure it had to be steroids.
37 posted on 12/04/2004 9:11:41 AM PST by finnigan2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

Man, tell me about it. I'm 58. I try not to gorge myself, but I finally just quit getting on the scale. I can tell by my clothes I've lost a little, and whether or not I get on the scales there seems to not be a lot I can do about this fatty arbuckle thing I've got going on. When I was 20, I weighed 117-118 lbs., then it worked up to 165 by the time I was 40. I've lost 25 lbs. since then a couple of times, only to gain it back by looking at something fattening. Now, I don't know what I weigh. I suspect about 165 (though I've been up to 179 a few months ago). Also, some of the blood pressure meds I take list weight gain in the side effects. Oh, and I'm a woman which probably makes it worse. However, at my age, I am not enthusiastic about starving or doing without carbs just so I can still look like Miss Piggy even after dieting. :@(
And, I just got tired of asking an inanimate object (the scales) whether or not I can be happy today.


38 posted on 12/04/2004 9:12:32 AM PST by Twinkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

LOL. Me, too. The years have given me two diseases. One is furniture disease: my chest dropped into my drawers. The second is dickey-do disease: my stomach sticks out further than my di** do.


39 posted on 12/04/2004 9:13:13 AM PST by JeeperFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Freepdonia

At one time I trained with a man who was a world champion power lifter in the 181 pound class. I never understood why I didn't develop the strength that he did. He wound up in the hospital when his liver ceased functioning.
The doctors were mystified about his condition until he informed them that he was using Dyanabol {sic}. He lived and I understood that his being 5'2" tall and having a muscular walking weight of over two hundred pounds wasn't normal. I found another training partner.


40 posted on 12/04/2004 9:17:51 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson