Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexico threatens Arizona over anti-illegals measure
WND ^ | Jan 28, 2005 | staff

Posted on 01/27/2005 11:00:51 PM PST by ETERNAL WARMING

INVASION USA Mexico threatens Arizona over anti-illegals measure Official says challenge in international courts possible to block voter-passed Proposition 200

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted: January 28, 2005 1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

A Mexican government official has threatened to use international courts to block an Arizona law meant to limit public benefits and voting rights to legal residents of the U.S.

Foreign Secretary Luis Ernesto Derbez said in a radio interview Wednesday that an international strategy would be used if other attempts to reverse Proposition 200 fail, the Associated Press reported.

"We are seeking all the legal opportunities that exist, first using the legal capacities of the United States itself and ... if that does not work, bringing it to international tribunals," AP quotes Derbez as saying.

Mexican officials have repeatedly complained about Proposition 200, which went into effect Tuesday. The statewide measure denies most taxpayer benefits to illegal aliens and requires state workers to report applicants for such benefits who may not be eligible. It also requires anyone registering to vote in the state to show proof of citizenship and bring a government-issued ID to the polling place.

AP reported Derbez expressed regret that, according to polls, about 40 percent of Mexican-Americans in Arizona supported Prop. 200. The measure passed with 60 percent of the vote.

"It's sad, and it gives an idea of how we have to work to educate even our own Mexican-Americans about why it is important that these proposals are not accepted," Derbez said.

The Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund has challenged Prop. 200, saying it is "an illegal, impermissible, unconstitutional state attempt to regulate immigration policy, which is a fundamental function and responsibility of our federal government. Proposition 200 is mean-spirited and un-American."


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: aliens; arizona; ftaa; geopolitics; icc; immigrantlist; immigration; maldef; mexico; nafta; nwo; oas; prop200
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: xtremepoison61

You would probably get the money too!!


41 posted on 01/28/2005 9:20:09 AM PST by international american (Tagline not convinced.............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Missouri

Unfreakingbelieveable ping.


42 posted on 01/28/2005 11:13:14 AM PST by MissouriConservative ( Do your duty in all things. You cannot do more; you should never wish to do less. - Robert E. Lee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: recalcitrant

"Is the subject matter embarassing to folks around here?"

Yes, and I will prove it...


43 posted on 01/28/2005 12:48:20 PM PST by HadEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: ETERNAL WARMING
"we have to work to educate even our own Mexican-Americans"

This from the Foreign Secretary of Mexico. Hey Mexian-Americans, how's it feel to be pwned?

Yes I did intentionally spelled it that way. From UrbanDictionary.com

1. pwned A corruption of the word "Owned." This originated in an online game called Warcraft, where a map designer misspelled "owned." When the computer beat a player, it was supposed to say, so-and-so "has been owned." Instead, it said, so-and-so "has been pwned." It basically means "to own" or to be dominated by an opponent or situation, especially by some god-like or computer-like force

45 posted on 01/28/2005 12:59:07 PM PST by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING
"Proposition 200 is mean-spirited and un-American."

Oh well that settles it then. It MUST be unconstitutional on that basis alone.... I'm not quite sure how requiring voter to be citizens is unconstitutional? Heck I thought that the law specifies that only citizens can vote.

46 posted on 01/28/2005 1:04:06 PM PST by Tempest (Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING

I wonder why it's under the topic of conspiracy?


47 posted on 01/28/2005 1:05:03 PM PST by Tempest (Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
It's not that I won't stand for criticism of President Bush. It's just that some people put their criticism in such an ignorant non constructive manner that it does noting to further the debate. But instead only serves to beat the war drums for frothy single issue die hards.
48 posted on 01/28/2005 1:08:32 PM PST by Tempest (Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
"Some people put their criticism in such an ignorant non constructive manner that it does noting to further the debate. But instead only serves to beat the war drums for frothy single issue die hards."

Are you serious?

Do you really consider the objection to Mexico's official insistance that they OR any international kangaroo court should supercede the will of the American people a "single issue"??

49 posted on 01/28/2005 1:21:57 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING

The topic says "Conspiracy."


50 posted on 01/28/2005 2:27:20 PM PST by KiloLima ("guest worker program" is to amnesty as "insurgent." is to terrorist . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

Perhaps you have a reading comprehension problem. I said none of the things in which you inferred.


51 posted on 01/28/2005 2:27:53 PM PST by Tempest (Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Tempest

Maybe you can clarify who and what what the phrase at your post "single issue diehards" refer to?


52 posted on 01/28/2005 3:04:28 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Single issue diehards are myopic individuals that fixate on one issue and are misguided enough to think that a singular political issue is what's at stake in this country.

They tend explode a singular issue into a huge issue via absurd extrapolations.
53 posted on 01/28/2005 3:12:44 PM PST by Tempest (Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
For example silly people that think that Kid Rocks presence at an inaugural event is a major priority in the GOP platform and should be stopped immediately because he doesn't pass the moral litmus test of certain overzealous individuals...

Or those whom think that Sponge Bob Square pants is a larger crisis than the Iraq war and Social Security reform and believe that he is the ambassador of gay doom in America...
54 posted on 01/28/2005 3:15:49 PM PST by Tempest (Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
"I said none of the things in which you inferred."

Weasel words.

Do you have you honorary ICC membership card yet?

55 posted on 01/28/2005 3:20:40 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

You imagination is running away FROM you.


56 posted on 01/28/2005 3:21:51 PM PST by Tempest (Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
Lol, you've exposed yourself as an ignoramus on the issues -- ALL of them.

Are you sure it's safe for you to leave the house alone, or do you need to call social services?

57 posted on 01/28/2005 3:23:41 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
"Lol, you've exposed yourself as an ignoramus on the issues -- ALL of them."

My bad. I really should take Kid Rock and Sponge Bob more seriously......

Sigh... *shakes head*

58 posted on 01/28/2005 3:26:11 PM PST by Tempest (Click on my name for a long list of press contacts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: MissouriConservative

The Mexican government has no shame.


59 posted on 01/28/2005 4:13:26 PM PST by Missouri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson