Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: oceanview

That is different from what I read. But I really haven't followed it as closely as others have here, so you may well be right. It does make sense to me that this could be a cover-up of an initial injury. But it just seems to be too gruesome to have the parents doing it. I just don't know...


1,079 posted on 08/23/2006 12:42:03 PM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1076 | View Replies ]


To: twigs

mark


1,080 posted on 08/23/2006 12:48:38 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1079 | View Replies ]

To: twigs

just heard on both CNN and FNC -it looks like the fingernail DNA has been "excluded" - it was contaminated by unclean nail clippers used during autopsy to recover the sample.

the only DNA left is in the underwear.


1,134 posted on 08/23/2006 2:50:43 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1079 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson