Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Plan to Disappear Canada (North American Union)
The August Review ^ | unknown | Murray Dobbin

Posted on 06/09/2007 7:22:27 AM PDT by ovrtaxt

The Plan to Disappear Canada Print E-mail

'Deep integration' comes out of the shadows.

By Murray Dobbin, Vancouver 

If the machinations going on in this country regarding so-called "deep integration" were instead a communist conspiracy to take over the country (you will, of course, have to try hard to imagine this) the news media would be blaring the story.

Pundits would pontificate, editorialists would erupt, security forces would be unleashed.

Instead, a virtual conspiracy to make the country disappear through assimilation into the U.S. gets barely a mention.

But news of the scheme -- formally called the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP) -- is finally breaking out of the secret chambers of the ruling elite and the federal government. This is both good news and bad. It's good that ordinary citizens are finally getting a glimpse of the betrayal of their country. The news is bad because it reflects just how much of this scheme is already being implemented.

Given the meetings of CEOs and politicians to advance the scheme politically, as well as all that must go into its actual implementation, there is simply too much activity to keep secret.

Ten dots to connect

Here are 10 developments in the plan to disappear Canada.

1) Pesticides 'harmonized.' The most thoroughly reported story (though even this did not go much beyond the CanWest chain) was the revelation that Canada was about to "harmonize" its regulations, setting limits for pesticide residue on fruits and vegetables. In 40 per cent of the cases, the U.S. allows for higher levels. Richard Aucoin, chief registrar of the Pest Management Regulatory Agency, which sets Canada's pesticide levels, said that Canada's higher levels were a "trade irritant."

The downgrading of health protection had been a initiative, but is being "fast-tracked" as part of the Security and Prosperity Partnership. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Some 300 regulatory regimes are currently going through the same process.

2) Tory tirade. The next story that broke through the wall of media silence reported on the paranoid reaction of the Harper Conservatives to any criticism of the . The occasion was hearings of the Commons International Trade Committee into the SPP, forced by the NDP.

Gordon Laxer, head of Alberta's Parkland Institute, was testifying on the energy implications of the SPP, warning that eastern Canada could end up "freezing in the dark." He had barely started when the chair of the committee, Conservative MP Leon Benoit, demanded that Laxer halt his "irrelevant" testimony. The Committee members overruled Benoit -- who promptly (and illegally) adjourned the meeting and stomped out. The NDP and Liberal members nonetheless continued without him.

3) Council of corporate power. The SPP initiative began in earnest back in 2002 with the Canadian Council of Chief Executives (formerly the BCNI), the most powerful corporate body in the country. It continues it leadership role, but does not promote the scheme just in its own name. It instead has helped create several supportive bodies that now help drive the agenda. Included in these are the North American Competitive Council (NACC), which includes CEOs of the largest North American corporations, and which institutionalizes the exclusively corporate nature of the agreement. The NACC is the only advisory group to the three NAFTA/SPP governments.

4) Secretive summit. The NACC at least is public. But much of what happens in building the elite consensus for deep integration is done in absolute secrecy or very privately, away from the prying eyes of the media. The most secretive of these was held last year from Sept. 12 to 14, in Banff Springs. As The Tyee reported, the gathering was sponsored by something called the North American Forum* and it was attended by some of the most powerful members of the North American ruling elite.

Attendees, according to a leaked list that could not be confirmed, included Donald Rumsfeld, George Schultz (former U.S. Secretary of State), General Rick Hillier, Defence Minister Gordon O'Connor and Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day. The media was not informed of the meeting and it was first revealed by the weekly Banff Crag & Canyon.

Stockwell Day refused to even confirm he was there, but said that even if he was, it was a "private" meeting that he would not comment on. There is no better indication that these meetings, and the SPP itself, constitute a parallel governing structure -- unaccountable to any democratic institution or the public.

5) 'No fly' coordination. Canada will have its own "no-fly" list just like our U.S. "partner."

As the Council of Canadians pointed out: "The no-fly list is very much a Security and Prosperity Partnership initiative. 'The SPP Report to Leaders, August 2006' outlines 105 SPP initiatives. Initiative #93 states, 'Develop, test, evaluate and implement a plan to establish comparable aviation passenger screening, and the screening of baggage and air cargo (for North America).'"

Canada's privacy commissioner Jennifer Stoddart has raised a number of concerns about the plan including the fact that the list will be shared with the U.S., that "false positives" are a virtual certainty, and that there is no evidence put forward by the government that the list will improve airline security.

6) Bye, bye Canadian dollar? David Dodge, the head of the , told a Chicago audience that a single currency for North America "is possible." That would see a big chunk of Canadian and the ability to guide the economy through monetary policy go out the window. It's not the first time Dodge has mused about abandoning the Canadian dollar - or deep integration.

7) Water and oil giveaways. The deep integrationists clearly see Canadian water as a North American resource, not a Canadian resource. At yet another very private meeting, held in Calgary on April 27th under the auspices of yet another forum, it was made clear that water is on the table for negotiation.

Discussion of bulk "water transfers" and diversions took place at a Calgary meeting of the North American Future 2025 Project (partly funded by the U.S. government). The meeting based its deliberations on the false notion that Canada has 20 per cent of the world's fresh water. Actual available supply amounts to only around six per cent -- about the same as has the U.S.

The water (and environment) meeting was preceded by another on April 26th talking about "North American" energy. The beneficiary of these discussions is pretty clear when you realize Canada has no national energy policy. We are the only energy exporting country in the world without a one.

Gordon Laxer told the Parliamentary committee: "The National Energy Board wrote me on April 12: 'Unfortunately, the NEB has not undertaken any studies on security of supply.'" He was also told by the NEB that Canada does not maintain a 90 day energy reserve as other developed nations do. As Laxer points out, "Canada may be a net exporter, but it still imports 40 per cent of its oil -- 850,000 barrels per day -- to meet 90 per cent of Atlantic Canada's and Quebec's needs, and 40 per cent of Ontario's."

Canada exports 63 per cent of its oil production and 56 per cent of its natural gas, percentages that can never decrease under NAFTA.

8) NAFTA Superhighway. State governments in the U.S. are becoming increasingly alarmed at the prospects of deep integration. Earlier this year, Idaho became the first state to pass a legislative resolution directing the U.S. Congress to drop out of the SPP, which is referred to as the North American Union amongst U.S. opponents. Thirteen states in addition to Idaho are calling on Congress to abandon the SPP: Georgia, Arizona, Missouri, Illinois, Oregon, Montana, South Carolina, Oklahoma, Utah, South Dakota, Tennessee, Washington and Virginia.

Part of the opposition is focused on plans for a so-called NAFTA Superhighway: actually a corridor several hundred metres wide including rail lines, freeways and pipelines from Mexico to the Canadian border. There is a growing grass roots movement against the SPP in the U.S., but led by the right over the issue of compromising American sovereignty.

9) Trade, Investment and Labour Mobility Agreement (TILMA). While U.S. states, concerned about state rights under an unaccountable "North American Union," are organizing against the scheme, Canadian provinces are either blithely unaware or knowingly complicit in the deal. More Canadians may be aware of TILMA -- the investors' rights agreement between B.C. and Albert -- than they are about the SPP, but in reality they are one and the same.

TILMA is major piece of the deep integration, deregulation imperative and fits hand in glove with the SPP. There is a similar, though more informal, process evolving in the Atlantic provinces, called "Atlantica." And B.C. is now pushing the so-called Gateway Initiative, a kind of regional superhighway project that will see huge and environmentally disastrous expansion of ports, highways and pipelines to further supply the U.S.'s insatiable demand for resources and cheap Asian goods.

10) The next SPP summit. The third leaders summit on the SPP will take place this August 21-22nd in Montebello, Quebec, not far from Ottawa. By the time it does many more Canadian will be aware of it.

Part of the reason that news of the SPP/deep integration issue is finally seeing the light of day is that opposition is growing and groups fighting the SPP are having an impact. The Council of Canadians, the CLC and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives held an SPP teach-in in Ottawa last month and many civil society groups are now taking deep integration to their members. Demonstrations are planned for the summit. The NDP continues to press the government on SPP secrecy and the Green Party's Elizabeth May has said deep integration will be a focus of the party's election platform.

It is hard to think of any other issue in modern Canadian history, especially one that will literally determine whether the country survives or not, that has taken so long to get public attention. I first wrote about it September, 2002.

By the time the SPP summit has come and gone and the fall political season begins, deep integration, the most treacherous plan for the country yet devised by Bay Street, will be increasingly exposed.

And by the next election, we could see a repeat of the great "free trade" election of 1988. This time we have to win.

------------------ 



TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: amero; atlantica; buygunsandspam; buythismanacuban; canada; canadaisdoomed; canadiandollar; cuespookymusic; currency; dollar; doomage; embraceleftism; energy; energysecurity; globalism; icecreammandrake; loonie; naftasuperhighway; nationalsovereignty; nau; northamericanunion; spp; tilma; usa; usaisdoomed; usdollar; votegreen; waterrights; wearedoomed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: Maeve
At least not everyone is asleep at the wheel. SPP is a rabid dog that needs to be put down and fast.

Indeed. I don't believe that there will be an NAU or NAFTA Superhighway, but I do think that the SPP is unconstitutional. It wouldn't surprise me if it was unconstitutional in all three countries. They should at least list for us the treaties and laws that support this stuff.

81 posted on 06/09/2007 12:58:17 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Will I be suspended again for this remark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
The superhighway. There is trade that goes on between Canada, the United States, and Mexico. There has been trade going on between what is now those three countries for millennia. There are already smaller roads connecting all three nations.

Plus, there are numerous north-south corridors in the US that Congress has designated for improvement, as well as a group (NASCO) pushing for improvements on I-35, I-29, and I-94.

82 posted on 06/09/2007 1:00:31 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Will I be suspended again for this remark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
The American dollar is already the international currency. If Canada, the United States, and Mexico are going to have a single currency, it would make sense to just adopt the American dollar (and call it the American dollar--Canada and the United States already use the term dollar, and Mexico would probably be on board with it, too).

I'll accept that if the Federal Reserve is abolished. Otherwise, the Fed would end up screwing over Canada and Mexico, as well as the US, should it make a mistake with its monetary policy.

83 posted on 06/09/2007 1:02:53 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Will I be suspended again for this remark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: maica

I gathered this guy was a leftist, and probably a raving moonbat leftist, by that little bio. Paul Martin, a leftist, has a “corporate” plan for Canada??? The “Right Wing” remaking of New Zealand (which has a living wage law, and whose politics, I suspect, are somewhat to the left of the US)??? New Zealand did get rid of ag subsidies, however, so maybe I’m wrong on that one?


84 posted on 06/09/2007 1:18:21 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Will I be suspended again for this remark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

There are a lot of “activists” in Canada who are very similar to communists. I would bet that this guy is in that category, although I do not recall hearing about him when I lived in Vancouver. NZ is definitely NOT a right-wing country. They had gone so far toward the socialism model, that everyone agreed it was time to pull back just a little!


85 posted on 06/09/2007 1:36:27 PM PDT by maica (America will be a hyperpower that's all hype and no power -- if we do not prevail in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: philetus

Because I disagree with this insanity I must be a DUer? Sorry, friend, you’re wrong on that count as well.


86 posted on 06/09/2007 3:47:57 PM PDT by cammie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; GMMAC; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; ...
Canada ping.

Please send me a FReepmail to get on or off this Canada ping list.

87 posted on 06/09/2007 4:39:28 PM PDT by fanfan ("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: maica
It doesn’t seem to upset the equilibrium of Florida or Canada.

I live in FL. Yes it does.

88 posted on 06/09/2007 4:40:41 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (THOMPSON NEEDS TO CLARIFY HIS POSITION ON THE SPP BEFORE I SUPPORT HIM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: cammie

I posted direct links to http://www.spp.gov .

Would you care to post some proof that it doesn’t exist?


89 posted on 06/09/2007 4:43:07 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (THOMPSON NEEDS TO CLARIFY HIS POSITION ON THE SPP BEFORE I SUPPORT HIM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Halgr
OK.....I have been called a “Tin Foil” wacko too many times when I talk about this.

Now its starting to hit some limited segments of the media...

Ridicule is their most potent weapon.

I think that enough people became interested enough in this push to legalize tens of millions of illegal aliens who do not share our values, language, or culture, against the desires of the overwhelming majority of Americans that they may start seeing this for what it is.

90 posted on 06/09/2007 5:12:00 PM PDT by zeugma (MS Vista has detected your mouse has moved, Cancel or Allow?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

Pointing to NASA’s website does not prove the moon-landings were staged. Quit playing games.


91 posted on 06/09/2007 5:19:28 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: RachelFaith
Funny how it’s the far right in the USA and the FAR LEFT up North which are the most opposed to this. Strange bedfellows indeed.

Not as strange as one might initially think. If you look into some of the rhetoric of the far left folks, you'll find that at the base of most of their ranting is an extreme dislike of corporatism. Unfortunately, they don't think about it enough to realize that it is not capitalism per se that is real problem and cause of the 'evil' they see, but is instead crony-capitalsm and markets distorted by government-sanctioned monopolies and a legal system that has been manipulated to favor the large corporation over the individual or private businessman.

A look at the current state of patent and copyright law is all you really need to get a really good feel for how this works. 

Only when the 'left' and 'right' realize that they are pawns that have been played off each other in order to re-create what is essentially a feudal society of rulers and serfs, will we actually make any real progress. Neither republican, nor democratic politicans are the answer. Both parties have the same ultimate goal. 

92 posted on 06/09/2007 5:26:54 PM PDT by zeugma (MS Vista has detected your mouse has moved, Cancel or Allow?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

we can’t manage our own country,

so,

how would we manage canada?


93 posted on 06/09/2007 5:44:40 PM PDT by ken21 (tv: 1. sells products. 2. indoctrinates viewers into socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: gcruse

!973 was just about the time the globalists kicked into full gear— infiltrating government agencies and corrupting federal politicians. That would be about 40 years ago.


94 posted on 06/09/2007 7:08:18 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer (I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt

How do Canadians cause problems in Florida?


95 posted on 06/09/2007 8:23:33 PM PDT by maica (America will be a hyperpower that's all hype and no power -- if we do not prevail in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Riodacat

” Yah, they’re 360 degrees apart in many respects.. ;)”

That was a winky, right? ‘Cause 360 degrees apart means they’re at the same place.


96 posted on 06/09/2007 9:28:56 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
7) Water and oil giveaways. The deep integrationists clearly see Canadian water as a North American resource, not a Canadian resource. At yet another very private meeting, held in Calgary on April 27th under the auspices of yet another forum, it was made clear that water is on the table for negotiation.

Just like the old greeting in high school yearbooks:

"Yours till the United States drinks Canada Dry."

Cheers!

97 posted on 06/09/2007 10:20:38 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
They shouldn't, but it would be in Canadians' interest to sell a resource that is renewable (if the water comes freely from lakes, rivers and streams--as opposed to aquifiers or ice packs) and can be replenished each year. It should be up to Canadians, but they shouldn't object to selling something they have in overabundance.
98 posted on 06/10/2007 1:28:43 AM PDT by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu
It should be up to Canadians

And that's the crux of the whole thing right there, isn't bit?

99 posted on 06/10/2007 4:11:47 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (THOMPSON NEEDS TO CLARIFY HIS POSITION ON THE SPP BEFORE I SUPPORT HIM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
This article reeks of NDP adgit prop. I may not agree with the SPP but I think this maybe suspect as the sources are far left anti freedom activists.
100 posted on 06/10/2007 8:01:23 AM PDT by freeforall (Answers are a burden for oneself, questions are a burden for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson