Posted on 08/18/2007 6:28:28 PM PDT by sionnsar
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:
Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.
Computers are the sine qua non of the modern age, therefore this ping. Comments are most welcome!
My wife’s computer came with Vista and it seems to be running just fine. Of course she isn’t what you’d call a power user. I dual-boot XP and linix and I’ve found linix to be far inferior to XP. If he’s so frustrated with Vista the Editor should go back to XP.
Probably failed to run the Vista Update Tool before he installed the program. I fixed the problems it warned me about and have had few problems and no desire to go back to XP.
Ouch!! Sooner or later Microsoft has to fix it, but in the meantime they are losing fans.
I like Vista.
Maybe I’m easily pleased seeing as I upgraded from Windows 98SE.
This guy’s in the wrong business. Vista is unnecessarily cumbersome out of the box, but it’s not THAT hard. This guy should maybe go into the livestock feed business.
I’ve got 1 machine running Vista Business Edition on a small home office network with a Windows Server 2003, and 4 other PC’s running XP Pro. The networking on the Vista machine is horrible—10 to 100 times slower than the XP machines. The hardware on this Vista machine is the 2nd best of all my PC’s, so it’s not the hardware.
Almost none of my main applications I use for my business will run under Vista, so why did I buy Vista? Uhhh... it’s pretty?
Note to others: Window Blinds makes XP almost as pretty as Vista, so save your money.
I have linux (ubuntu) and if you’re going to be bothered by Vista...trust me, you won’t want to put up with linux. It’s good for what it’s good for but it’s not good for people expecting a totally polished OS.
I would think that this guy, easier than most people, would be able to see the obvious:
It's the "protected Content" overhead.
And since that's embedded and woven throughout the entire OS, and that's the reason I will never even attempt to load VISTA onto any of my computers.
My thought is:
This guy does nothing but work with computers and operating systems.
What is going to happen to a semi- computer literate person like me?
My son is a tech. He advised that Vista will not let you download “Add-Ons” (Every now and then, you get a page that says:”To view this, you must download ___”)
UNLESS the download has been licensed by Microsoft.
I have an XP machine and a Vista machine. I can’t network them, I can’t share a printer, all kinds of little things don’t work with Vista, it sucks.
I’d install XP over it immediately if I could.
Kubuntu 6.10 was very close, for me Kubuntu 7.04 has pulled ahead -- though after a few months with XP at work I am not unhappy with it either. Just a couple of annoyances, and they're probably fixed by a setting somewhere I have not found yet.
I’m running XP, and I see no compelling reason to upgrade to Vista. And I’m a tech geek.
ok...I’ll be the one to ask the stupid question of why you are spamming (for lack of a better word) on an article about Windows Vista for the pro-life/Catholic Ping list?
ping
Must be something about the “defection and loss of faith.” :)
You would have been even more thrilled with Windows XP, probably.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.