Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter Disses Fred
Youtube/Fox ^ | 10/8/07 | AnnCoulter/Hannity

Posted on 10/09/2007 7:47:52 AM PDT by pissant

Hmmm...Ann is just one more who have come to the truth about this blowhard

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; axisofdesperation; doinghillaryswork; fred; pissanthropy; postcardfromoblivion; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 last
To: rednesss
Ohhh, so it’s either he “has no fire in the belly” or doesn’t “want it bad enough” or is “lazy” etc, etc, etc... or he’s been scheming to be President since he was in Middle School. Which one is it???? You can’t have it both ways. The guy imposed a 2 term limit on himself and walked away from being a U.S. Senator. I don’t think he’s been planning on running since prior to this year.

The statements you falsely attributed to me seems a desperate tactic even for a Thompson supporter.

Funny that you took it as being critical of Fred that he had thoughts of the White House before this year. Even stranger that you feel it's complimentary to Fred to imagine that he woke up one morning this year and had his first ever thought about running for the presidency.

161 posted on 10/09/2007 4:42:11 PM PDT by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Perchant

Uhh, you were the one that intimated that I was “selling a bridge” when I said that the episode was filmed many, many moons before he decided he was going to run for Pres. You would prefer a candidate that has been running for Pres since 8th grade??? Answer a question for a change instead of being snarky.


162 posted on 10/09/2007 6:05:01 PM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: rednesss
Answer a question for a change instead of being snarky

You seem to ask questions that are based on statements that you falsely attributed to me. I feel pretty certain that every two term Senator has had some presidential aspirations. I guess that you disagree with that or believe that Thompson is the exception.

If Thompson woke up one morning in the last year and was overcome with a burning desire to become POTUS in 2008, what is it that is stoking this burning desire now if he's never desired the job previously?

163 posted on 10/09/2007 7:20:17 PM PDT by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Perchant
"what is it that is stoking this burning desire now if he's never desired the job previously?"

He's said in several interviews, his 2 very young children. And the future of the country and this world that will be left to them. I'm sure he's not the first father who has felt the need to make the world a better place for his children. You seem to not be all that informed about Fred and his views and beliefs. Might I suggest that you do some research before opposing him.

164 posted on 10/09/2007 7:28:10 PM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: pissant

When will you Duncanphytes realize that he is out of it? Y’all have already ticked off half of FR with your attacks on other candidates. Get behind someone who has a chance.


165 posted on 10/09/2007 7:31:26 PM PDT by catfish1957 (In honor of my 5 Confederate ancestors whodefended their homeland during the War of Northn Agression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rednesss
He's said in several interviews, his 2 very young children. And the future of the country and this world that will be left to them. I'm sure he's not the first father who has felt the need to make the world a better place for his children.

If that's not pablum then nothing is pablum. What specific actions and policies will Fred put in place that will brighten the future of the USA? Surely he must have some in mind if he had a sudden epiphany this year that he needs to be the next President.

166 posted on 10/09/2007 8:26:32 PM PDT by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

We have just begun to fight


167 posted on 10/09/2007 10:11:36 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957
Duncan would definitly lose to Hillary

Thompson has a good chance of winning

julie annie is a pretty good bet

168 posted on 10/09/2007 10:26:33 PM PDT by KTM rider (Free Mexico ....Viva La Revolucion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Perchant

I don’t know, maybe he had a vision of Hillary as Pres for the next 8 years and that scared the bejesus out of him. I know it does me. If he did nothing, nothing, for 8 years, the US would be 100 times better off. And his guiding principles are “Federalism” and a return to the constraints that the Constitution puts on the federal government.


169 posted on 10/09/2007 11:14:31 PM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton
'Well, I have to admit, Coulter knows an awful lot about being a blowhard, she's a professional one and makes a living off of it."

I'm almost done with her latest book. (It came finally in the mail yesterday.)

I think that she mentioned you in it.

I doubt that you have read any of her books, or even that your political beliefs are in accord with most FReepers after that comment.

Ann rules.

170 posted on 10/10/2007 4:00:57 PM PDT by Radix (When I became a man, I put away childish things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FlashBack

Why have you concluded that Fred has the best chance to defeat Hillary?


171 posted on 10/10/2007 6:17:04 PM PDT by FreepersareproAmerica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: I_like_good_things_too

Dobson had good points.

Dobson doesn’t want to do what Hannity is doing. Of course, you’d probably praise Hannity if he were to endorse Fred. Dobson is correct that Fred is no better than Giuliani.


172 posted on 10/10/2007 6:18:47 PM PDT by FreepersareproAmerica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FreepersareproAmerica

I don’t know what you’re talking about. I don’t know why you are thinking I would praise Hannity for anything. You certainly haven’t been here long enough to have evaluated my relatively infrequent posts to determine I’m a Hannity schill (or Fred schill, whatever it is your suggesting).

For the record, I don’t have a favorite in the primary. And I’ll support any republican candidate (even McCain) in the general. Dobson has come off as an ass, to say he has good points doesn’t change that.


173 posted on 10/10/2007 6:40:01 PM PDT by I_like_good_things_too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Radix
Ann rules.

Blowhard: a very boastful talkative person.

I agree with most of Ann's political views but there's no denying she's boastful and talkative. In 1998 she told the Washington Post: "You want to be careful not to become just a blowhard." I don't think she was successful. She has been successful in making a lot of money being outrageously pugnacious.

If you like Coulter's style, fine. If you're hung up on her looks, it's OK with me. However, I feel no compulsion to agree with everything she says, or does. Hanging out with ultra liberals and dissing good conservatives does not make her a star in my book. She's rude and crude even when she's right. If you like her "ruling" you, OK. Not me. BTW, I'm not the only FReeper who feels this way.

174 posted on 10/10/2007 9:00:56 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Is There NO Republican candidate in Ann’s eyes that could successfully challenge Herself, the Cold and Joyless?

The whole bench is now out there, and while some of them were always decidedly rather feeble contenders, I had thought that SOME of them could have been treated a little more kindly.

The option of moving out of the US is not particularly appealing, as there are very few possible refuges still remaining. And it seems to be futile to remain here and try to reform this country from the inside, if this is all the encouragement we get.


175 posted on 10/11/2007 8:42:01 AM PDT by alloysteel (Ignorance is no handicap for some people in a debate. They just get more shrill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreepersareproAmerica

I think that Gulianni has to many negatives and alot of conservatives will stay home...Romney campaigns as a conservative but his record as a Gov. leaves some room for error. Hunter and Tanc...I support them, I’ve sent them some campaign contributions but they just don’t seem to be connecting with the masses.
I think Fred can win the support of the conservatives AND pull in alot of the Independants, not to mention the Dems who want a president Hillaryas much as we do. The folks who have voted ‘D’ in the past (I would call them ‘moderates’ they are no where near the Move-On types)that I work with say that they are actually looking at Fred as well. I guess they could have been Reagan-Democrats in the past.
I think Fred can do alot to unite this country, that’s why I posted what I posted.


176 posted on 10/11/2007 9:09:03 PM PDT by FlashBack (ProudPatriots.Org / WoundedWarriorProject.Org / MoveAmericaForward.Org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: FlashBack

Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin are disappointed in Fred Thompson’s senate record. I think Thompson won his senate campaign in Tennessee with a conservative platform, so he could have been more conservative than he was.

How do you explain campaign finance reform (it was almost called McCain-Feingold-Thompson) and his involvement with the Council on Foreign Relations?

Romney represented a state that has a higher percentage of liberals than conservatives. When he campaigned in MA, he must have promised them that he would keep their abortion policies as the status quo. It’s tougher to be a conservative in a more liberal state compared to a more conservative state, in which Tennessee tends to be.

I find it really tough to support any of the “front-runners.”

The only candidates I trust to actually do something about illegal alien invasions are Hunter and Tancredo. Of the two, I consider Hunter to be the better candidate.


177 posted on 10/15/2007 6:55:41 PM PDT by FreepersareproAmerica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: FreepersareproAmerica

I heard Fred being interviewed and he admitted that there were parts of the “McCain-Feingold” that he said hadn’t worked out the way that they had intended and if it was up to him they would change.


178 posted on 10/15/2007 10:29:24 PM PDT by FlashBack (WWW.PROUDPATRIOTS.ORG / WWW.MOVEAMERICAFORWARD.ORG / WWW.WOUNDEDWARRIORPROJECT.ORG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson