Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If You Want More War, More Spending, More Big Government, then HUCKABEE is your guy !
Numerous Listed (Edited) | Suck

Posted on 01/04/2008 4:02:36 PM PST by Suck My AR-16

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Nervous Tick
That may be proof of you're being irrationally against Huckabee, but it is not proof that it is not true that (once again):

Huckabee and his staff communicated with Bolton and Bolton agreed to have further communications (presumably to offer advise, which would be something Bolton would hardly avoid).

If I had to guess which of them is being less candid, I would have to say it is Ambassador Bolton.

41 posted on 01/04/2008 6:16:33 PM PST by unspun (God save us from egos -- especially our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: unspun

(sigh)

Let’s take it point by point.

>> Huckabee and his staff communicated with Bolton

True, according to Huckabee and his staff. Unsubstantiated by Bolton! But so what? I and my co-workers just “communicated” with Bill Gates — sent him an email asking him to be on our board of directors. But if I claim he is on my board, I’m a liar. Just like Huck was at the time he made his lying statement!

>> Bolton agreed to have further communications

Technically true... only because Bolton “agreed” to have further communications IN GENERAL with ANY UNNAMED candidate. But the implication that Bolton agreed to have further communications SPECIFICIALLY WITH HUCKSTER is false.

>> presumably to offer advise...
>> If I had to guess which of them is being less candid

Your presumptions and “guesses” are totally irrelevant.

You have yet to provide ANY substantiation of ANY of your claims WHATSOEVER. That makes you an ignorant shill only too eager to lie for your boy.


42 posted on 01/04/2008 6:26:33 PM PST by Nervous Tick (Retire Ron Paul! Support Chris Peden (www.chrispeden.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: unspun
But of course. There's no other.

This free-wheeling conservative-libertarian frowns on your nanny-state candidate.

43 posted on 01/04/2008 6:30:45 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (13-3 Green Bay Packers - The road to the Super Bowl begins NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
I have been accurate in calling statements what they are and in calling my common sense interpretations what they are.

Scream that I am a liar though, if you like. Do you think that will help your cause?

44 posted on 01/04/2008 6:30:54 PM PST by unspun (God save us from egos -- especially our own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Guys, guys !!

Lets talk about something important.

How may votes did the top three Democrats get in IOWA ?

Ans. - Democrats | Polls | County Results
Candidate Votes % of votes
Barack Obama 940 38%
John Edwards 744 30%
Hillary Clinton 737 29%

Now .... How many votes did the bottom three Republicans get ?

Ans. - Republicans | Polls | County Results
Candidate Votes % of votes
Ron Paul 11,598 10%
Rudy Giuliani 4,013 3%
Duncan Hunter 515 0%

Only Duncan hunter cannot beat any top democrat.

SOURCE MSMBC
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21229206


45 posted on 01/04/2008 6:54:09 PM PST by Suck My AR-16
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson