Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

The fossil record is no longer necessary for proving evolution. We can see its workings directly in genomes.
1 posted on 08/10/2008 4:21:37 AM PDT by Soliton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Soliton

> The fossil record is no longer necessary for proving
> evolution. We can see its workings directly in genomes.

Spoken with the authority and finality of someone who’s been there and done that and has the hat to prove it.


2 posted on 08/10/2008 4:26:08 AM PDT by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Soliton
:) After 100 years or so of insisting "it could, it will, it does...." fossils are abandoned....

that's funny, ed!
6 posted on 08/10/2008 6:04:56 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (Just say NObama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; AnalogReigns; Cacique; caryatid; Celtjew Libertarian; CobaltBlue; concentric circles; ...
Genetic
Genealogy
Send FReepmail if you want on/off GGP list
Marty = Paternal Haplogroup O(2?)(M175)
Maternal Haplogroup H
GG LINKS:
African Ancestry
DNAPrint Genomics
FamilyTree DNA
mitosearch
Nat'l Geographic Genographic Project
Oxford Ancestors
RelativeGenetics
Sorenson Molecular Genealogy Foundation
Trace Genetics
ybase
ysearch
The List of Ping Lists

9 posted on 08/10/2008 6:23:58 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Soliton
The fossil record is no longer necessary for proving evolution

An extremely frightening statement, from a scientific perspective. We can ignore the only evidence we have of extinct life forms for billions of years, because our theory is perfect and must remain unchallenged.

That's very similar to the Global Warming cultists, who say "the case in closed" because their computer models say so.

16 posted on 08/10/2008 8:19:08 AM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Soliton
The fossil record is no longer necessary for proving evolution.

Not "necessary," perhaps, but it's nice to have two major lines of evidence for a nested hierarchy.

Not to mention the joy of adding two more gaps every once in a while.

17 posted on 08/10/2008 8:25:23 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Soliton

Your blind faith in evolution exceeds the informed faith of those who believe Scripture. The physical evidence for a Creator creating according to the Scriptural account is not lacking.


19 posted on 08/10/2008 8:29:41 AM PDT by Theo (Global warming "scientists." Pro-evolution "scientists." They're both wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

· Google · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology magazine · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo ·
· History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


33 posted on 08/10/2008 9:00:47 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson