Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ed Hale got the divorcee decree of Dunham vs Obama Sr.
Plains Radio ^ | 1/2/09 | Patriot08

Posted on 01/02/2009 1:16:10 PM PST by patriot08

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 861-880881-900901-920 ... 1,941-1,945 next last
To: Peter Libra; JudyinCanada

LOL I’ll second the love of history and research! Ok Judy, wherefrom in Canada?


881 posted on 01/02/2009 7:47:19 PM PST by Chief Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 779 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

That is scary. My goodness, I can’t believe how alike they are.


882 posted on 01/02/2009 7:47:30 PM PST by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 866 | View Replies]

To: tyke

Either the decree will lead to the birth certificate as Ed has stated, or it won’t.

If Hale is an utter waste of time as you express what are you doing on this thread?

Who first found and then posted the divorce decree? You can’t give Ed any credit for that, can you?


883 posted on 01/02/2009 7:48:07 PM PST by freepersup (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies]

To: sticker
I think the 9/11 theorists are nuts. I will always believe Obama is hiding things. His past is hidden, things are constantly scrubbed clean on the Internet that lead to other leads, somethin’ smells fishy.
884 posted on 01/02/2009 7:48:12 PM PST by mojitojoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 849 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

I’m having a hard time keeping up, too... :-)


885 posted on 01/02/2009 7:48:29 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 857 | View Replies]

To: Chief Engineer

Wow. Thanks for dispelling a false perception that I’ve had for years. Didn’t they used to be a good source for such records? I’ve always heard that they were. Oh well...you learn something new every day.


886 posted on 01/02/2009 7:48:53 PM PST by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 871 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

where’s the morph of Aunt Esther ;-)


887 posted on 01/02/2009 7:49:19 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 866 | View Replies]

To: Chief Engineer

Hamilton, Ontario....about an hour north of Buffalo....but not near as much snow.


888 posted on 01/02/2009 7:49:46 PM PST by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 881 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

You said — “No. Stupid thought on your part.”

That’s certainly one thing you can depend upon Free Republic posters to let you know about with your ideas — when they differ with them... that they’re stupid... LOL...


889 posted on 01/02/2009 7:50:00 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 851 | View Replies]

To: truthfreedom

No, the COLB shows 4th as date of birth, but 8th as date filed with registrar.


890 posted on 01/02/2009 7:51:03 PM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

I’m playing catchup on this thread (and am not listening to the radio) - is your comment below about the divorce decree? - thanks!

“VERY INTERESTING POINT by the lawyer.

The document is invalid simply from having the Certificate Number blacked out.

Bottom of Certification says “Any altercation of this document makes it invalid”.”


891 posted on 01/02/2009 7:51:18 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

To: Peter Libra

You said — “Doubters of Chester Arthur at his time and place are long gone, of course. As to the present case, they are going to hang on like a wire haired terrier clamped onto someones posterior. I am with ‘em.”

Yes, I definitely believe that...


892 posted on 01/02/2009 7:51:51 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 880 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
Isn't it ironic they never noticed that when Ann went to University of Washington, she registered as Ann Dunham but she was calling herself Ann Obama when she visited with her friends in August, 1961? Now can we put all those names together and get Stanley Ann Dunham Obama?
893 posted on 01/02/2009 7:51:53 PM PST by Chief Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 791 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler

You said:
“Well, then I guess you don’t want to know the answer to that question. However, I would still like to know the answer to that question of how many pieces of legislation was invalidated during Chester A. Arthur’s term in office. That would give me some indication from history as to what we’ll be facing...”

Well it will not give us any real indication at all considering that it was never proven that Arthur was ineligible at the time. In this case e are still in the beginning of this process and it very well may be proven that Obama has a major problem in this case and then we will possibly see for the first time what will happen.

The Arthur case does very little toshine a light on “what to expect”

You also said:
“It sure is “hot” in certain quarters — but it’s certainly a total “non-starter” in other quarters. I guess it depends on what place you’re looking at it from...”

Well that is why I asked how many Supreme Court cases were involved in the Arthur case. It seems that it is already a much hotter issue this time around.


894 posted on 01/02/2009 7:52:00 PM PST by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 878 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Thanks Lucy. Just got home and was trying to catch up. Your ping is most helpful.


895 posted on 01/02/2009 7:52:03 PM PST by Oorang (Tyranny thrives best where government need not fear the wrath of an armed people - Alex Kozinski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 862 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
So, if Barack Obama married Chelsea Clinton, their baby would be named Web X?

-PJ

896 posted on 01/02/2009 7:52:03 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (You can never overestimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 866 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

FReepers who are listening through my posts: I’m done for the night. Sounds like the attorney is going to take calls and answer questions. Ed Hale isn’t going to tell us where the port of entry is. G’night.


897 posted on 01/02/2009 7:52:13 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 874 | View Replies]

To: Chief Engineer

Could a copy of this B.C. at a port of entry have been kept in the records at that site?


898 posted on 01/02/2009 7:52:21 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 650 | View Replies]

To: Chief Engineer

“an architect in Chicago”

Do you happen to remember his name or the name of any architect firm? I don’t see a submitter listed on that site.


899 posted on 01/02/2009 7:52:28 PM PST by nominal (Christus dominus. Christus veritas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 871 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

I know that you can look up the historical ownership of houses, but how do we know the owners didn’t rent it out?


900 posted on 01/02/2009 7:52:56 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 709 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 861-880881-900901-920 ... 1,941-1,945 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson