Said LeGrande: Now let us look at what I said. I said that the apparent position and the actual position are not the same. Let me change that slightly. The apparent motion and actual motion are not the same. Both statements are synonymous.
Give me a break. First you
say that breeding and mating are the same thing, then you
say that "see" and "appear" are the same thing, and now you're
saying that "Apparent motion" is the same as "Apparent position?"
Unbelievable. Motion and position are two different things dude - I don't know what else to say. Didn't you also confuse mass with something? What was that? I don't remember now.
But seriously, position and motion are not the same thing.
And it was apparent
position that you said. And if it had just been a little mistake, you'd have said "Oh, I meant motion not position" right away - but you didn't. But, you are welcome to change your views if you learn something new - just tell me what your new view is!
And besides, if you're right then how come not answer my color coded questions? And you still refuse to answer my question of how, considering your past behavour and wrong ideas, how I can logically come to any conclusion other then that you aren't honest?
-Jesse
1,308 posted on
02/11/2009 9:22:22 AM PST by
mrjesse
(Could it be true? Imagine, being forgiven, and having a cause, greater then yourself, to live for!)
Give me a break. First you say that breeding and mating are the same thing, then you say that "see" and "appear" are the same thing, and now you're saying that "Apparent motion" is the same as "Apparent position?" No, it is the relationship. Apparent motion to actual motion, Vs. apparent position to actual position.
You agree that apparent motion is not the same as actual motion, correct? Then is apparent position the same as actual position?